Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26744831›Full record

ReviewCritical reviews in food science and nutrition2017

Risks and benefits related to alimentary exposure to xenoestrogens.

Ilaria Paterni, Carlotta Granchi, Filippo Minutolo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical reviews in food science and nutrition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Antitumour Property ofBreast cancer : basic and clinical research · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ilaria Paternia Dipartimento di Farmacia , Università di Pisa , Pisa , Italy.
Carlotta Granchia Dipartimento di Farmacia , Università di Pisa , Pisa , Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5849-0722
Filippo Minutoloa Dipartimento di Farmacia , Università di Pisa , Pisa , Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3312-104X

Funding

Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of Lactate Dehydrogenase InhibitorsR01GM098453 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI HERGENROTHER, PAUL · 2012 to 2015
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM098453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Xenoestrogens are widely diffused in the environment and in food, thus a large portion of human population worldwide is exposed to them. Among alimentary xenoestrogens, phytoestrogens (PhyEs) are increasingly being consumed because of their potential health benefits, although there are also important risks associated to their ingestion. Furthermore, other xenoestrogens that may be present in food are represented by other chemicals possessing estrogenic activities, that are commonly defined as endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs). EDCs pose a serious health concern since they may cause a wide range of health problems, starting from pre-birth till adult lifelong exposure. We herein provide an overview of the main classes of xenoestrogens, which are classified on the basis of their origin, their structures and their occurrence in the food chain. Furthermore, their either beneficial or toxic effects on human health are discussed in this review.

Indexed as

Food AnalysisEndocrine DisruptorsEnvironmental ExposureHumansPhytoestrogensRisk AssessmentXenobioticsEndocrine DisruptorsPhytoestrogensXenobioticsendocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs)Estrogen receptorsmycoestrogensphytoestrogensxenoestrogens

Identifiers

PMID26744831
PMCPMC6104637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.