Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26744774›Full record

ArticleGut microbes2016

Antibiotic-treated versus germ-free rodents for microbiota transplantation studies.

Randi Lundberg, Martin F Toft, Benjamin August, Axel K Hansen, Camilla H F Hansen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut microbes, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Fecal microbial transplants as investigative tools in cancer.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Randi Lundberga Section of Experimental Animal Models , Department of Veterinary Disease Biology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen , Frederiksberg C , Denmark.
Martin F Toftb Internal Research and Development, Taconic Biosciences , Lille Skensved , Denmark.
Benjamin Augustb Internal Research and Development, Taconic Biosciences , Lille Skensved , Denmark.
Axel K Hansena Section of Experimental Animal Models , Department of Veterinary Disease Biology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen , Frederiksberg C , Denmark.
Camilla H F Hansena Section of Experimental Animal Models , Department of Veterinary Disease Biology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen , Frederiksberg C , Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We recently investigated the applicability of antibiotic-treated recipient mice for transfer of different gut microbiota profiles. With this addendum we elaborate on perspectives and limitations of using antibiotics as an alternative to germ-free (GF) technology in microbial transplantation studies, and we speculate on the housing effect. It is possible to transfer host phenotypes via fecal transplantation to antibiotic-treated animals, but problems with reproducibility, baseline values, and antibiotic resistance genes should be considered. GF animals maintained in isolators still seem to be the best controlled models for long-term microbial transplantation, but antibiotic-treated recipients are also commonly utilized. We identify a need for systematic experiments investigating the stability of microbial transplantations by addressing 1) the recipient status as either GF, antibiotic-treated or specific pathogen free and 2) different levels of protected housing systems. In addition, the developmental effect of microbes on host physiological functions should be evaluated in the different scenarios.

Indexed as

Specific Pathogen-Free OrganismsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsFecal Microbiota TransplantationGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGastrointestinal TractMiceModels, AnimalReproducibility of ResultsAnti-Bacterial Agentsanimal modelsantibioticsfecal transplantationgerm-freegut microbiotamousereproducibility

Identifiers

PMID26744774
PMCPMC4856451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.