Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26744624›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2015

Optical Approach to Resin Formulation for 3D Printed Microfluidics.

Hua Gong, Michael Beauchamp, Steven Perry, Adam T Woolley, Gregory P Nordin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Bioactive Glass Microscaffolds Fabricated by Two-Photon Lithography.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. 3D printed microfluidic devices with electrodes for electrochemical analysis.Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. High-resolution stereolithography: Negative spaces enabled by control of fluid mechanics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hua GongDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, United States.
Michael BeauchampDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, United States.
Steven PerryDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, United States.
Adam T WoolleyDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, United States.
Gregory P NordinDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, United States.

Funding

Phase-Changing Sacrificial Layer Microfluidics for Enhanced Protein AnalysisR01EB006124 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY · PI WOOLLEY, ADAM THOMAS · 2006 to 2016
$3.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microfluidics imposes different requirements on 3D printing compared to many applications because the critical features for microfluidics consist of internal microvoids. Resins for general 3D printing applications, however, are not necessarily formulated to meet the requirements of microfluidics and minimize the size of fabricated voids. In this paper we use an optical approach to guide custom formulation of resins to minimize the cross sectional size of fabricated flow channels as exemplars of such voids. We focus on stereolithgraphy (SL) 3D printing with Digital Light Processing (DLP) based on a micromirror array and use a commercially available 3D printer. We develop a mathematical model for the optical dose delivered through the thickness of a 3D printed part, including the effect of voids. We find that there is a fundamental trade-off between the homogeneity of the optical dose within individual layers and how far the critical dose penetrates into a flow channel during fabrication. We also experimentally investigate the practical limits of flow channel miniaturization given the optical properties of a resin and find that the minimum flow channel height is ~3.5-5.5

Identifiers

PMID26744624
PMCPMC4699590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.