ReviewAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2016
Distinguishing Neuroimaging Features in Patients Presenting with Visual Hallucinations.
Review in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Myeloid sarcoma of the septum pellucidum causing hallucinations and personality changes in an elderly woman: a case report.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- Content-based clustering of hallucinations across sensory modalities in a large online survey.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Prominent veins sign is associated with malignant cerebral edema after acute ischemic stroke.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Psychosis Associated with Acquired Porencephaly-Cause or Incidental Finding? Case Report and Review of Literature.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Review
- The Utility of Molecular Imaging for Investigating Patients with Visual Hallucinations.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2016Article
- Article
- Moving Past Anti-VEGF: Novel Therapies for Treating Diabetic Retinopathy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedERRATUM.2017
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Visual hallucinations are relatively uncommon presentations in medical and psychiatric clinics, where they are generally regarded as a marker of possible underlying "organic" brain disease. Thus, patients with visual hallucinations are often referred for imaging of the brain. This article presents a pragmatic approach for the radiologist reviewing such imaging. Because conditions that can present with visual hallucinations are legion, a familiarity with the features of the hallucinations themselves, which can serve as clues to the underlying cause, can be helpful in interpreting such cases. We consider the nature of visual hallucinations and the mechanisms underlying their formation. We then provide a framework to guide the search for their cause, first in terms of focal lesions along the visual pathway and then global conditions affecting >1 region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.