Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26744302›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2017

Dietary patterns in weight loss maintenance: results from the MedWeight study.

Eleni Karfopoulou, Dora Brikou, Eirini Mamalaki, Fragiskos Bersimis, Costas A Anastasiou, James O Hill, Mary Yannakoulia

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nutrition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Successful weight loss maintenance: A systematic review of weight control registries.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eleni KarfopoulouDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University, El. Venizelou 70, 17671, Athens, Greece.
Dora BrikouDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University, El. Venizelou 70, 17671, Athens, Greece.
Eirini MamalakiDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University, El. Venizelou 70, 17671, Athens, Greece.
Fragiskos BersimisDepartment of Informatics and Telematics, Harokopio University, El. Venizelou 70, 17671, Athens, Greece.
Costas A AnastasiouDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University, El. Venizelou 70, 17671, Athens, Greece.
James O HillAnschutz Health and Wellness Center, University of Colorado, 12348 E Montview Blvd, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Mary YannakouliaDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University, El. Venizelou 70, 17671, Athens, Greece. myiannak@hua.gr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe dietary habits contributing to weight loss maintenance are not sufficiently understood. We studied weight loss maintainers in comparison with regainers, to identify the differentiating behaviors.

methodsThe MedWeight study is a Greek registry of weight loss maintainers and regainers. Participants had intentionally lost ≥10 % of their weight and either had maintained this loss for over a year, or had regained weight. Questionnaires on demographics and lifestyle habits were completed online. Dietary assessment was carried out by two telephone 24-h recalls.

resultsPresent analysis focused on 361 participants (32 years old, 39 % men): 264 maintainers and 97 regainers. Energy and macronutrient intake did not differ by maintenance status (1770 ± 651 kcal in maintainers vs. 1845 ± 678 kcal in regainers, p = 0.338), although protein intake per kg of body weight was higher in maintainers (1.02 ± 0.39 vs. 0.83 ± 0.28 g/kg in regainers, p < 0.001). Physical activity energy expenditure was greater for maintainers in men (by 1380 kcal per week, p = 0.016), but not women. Salty snacks, alcohol and regular soda were more frequently consumed by men regainers. Principal component analysis identified a healthy dietary pattern featuring mainly unprocessed cereal, fruit, vegetables, olive oil and low-fat dairy. Male maintainers were 4.6 times more likely to follow this healthy pattern compared to regainers (OR 4.6, 95 % CI 2.0-11.0). No similar finding was revealed in women. Other characteristics of maintainers but not of regainers were: involvement in meal preparation and eating at home for men, and a higher eating frequency and slower eating rate for women.

conclusionsMen maintaining weight loss were much more likely to adhere to a healthy eating pattern. Eating at home, involvement in meal preparation, higher eating frequency and slower eating rate were also associated with maintenance. These lifestyle habits of successful maintainers provide target behaviors to improve obesity treatment.

Indexed as

Body Weight MaintenanceDiet, HealthyWeight LossAdolescentAdultAgedBody Mass IndexBody WeightEnergy IntakeExerciseFemaleGreeceHumansLife StyleLogistic ModelsMaleDietary patternsMaintainersRegainersWeight loss maintenance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.