Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26744250›Full record

ReviewChemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2016

Mechanistic Investigations into the Application of Sulfoxides in Carbohydrate Synthesis.

Martin A Fascione, Robin Brabham, W Bruce Turnbull

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Guidelines forACS central science · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Martin A FascioneYork Structural Biology Lab, Department of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington Road, York, YO10 5DD, UK. martin.fascione@york.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0066-4419
Robin BrabhamYork Structural Biology Lab, Department of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington Road, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
W Bruce TurnbullSchool of Chemistry and Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. w.b.turnbull@leeds.ac.uk.
University of York · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The utility of sulfoxides in a diverse range of transformations in the field of carbohydrate chemistry has seen rapid growth since the first introduction of a sulfoxide as a glycosyl donor in 1989. Sulfoxides have since developed into more than just anomeric leaving groups, and today have multiple roles in glycosylation reactions. These include as activators for thioglycosides, hemiacetals, and glycals, and as precursors to glycosyl triflates, which are essential for stereoselective β-mannoside synthesis, and bicyclic sulfonium ions that facilitate the stereoselective synthesis of α-glycosides. In this review we highlight the mechanistic investigations undertaken in this area, often outlining strategies employed to differentiate between multiple proposed reaction pathways, and how the conclusions of these investigations have and continue to inform upon the development of more efficient transformations in sulfoxide-based carbohydrate synthesis.

Indexed as

CarbohydratesGlycosylationMannosidesSulfoxidesThioglycosidesCarbohydratesMannosidesSulfoxidesThioglycosidescarbohydratesglycosylationmechanismorganic synthesissulfoxides

Identifiers

PMID26744250
PMCPMC4794778
OpenAlexW2188896531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.