Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26744053›Full record

ArticleAmbio2016

Conceptualizing and communicating management effects on forest water quality.

Martyn N Futter, Lars Högbom, Salar Valinia, Ryan A Sponseller, Hjalmar Laudon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Martyn N FutterDepartment of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden. martyn.futter@slu.se.
Lars HögbomSkogforsk, Uppsala Science Park, 751 83, Uppsala, Sweden. lars.hogbom@skogforsk.se.
Salar ValiniaNorwegian Institute for Water Research, Gaustadalléen 21, 0349, Oslo, Norway. salar.valinia@niva.no.
Ryan A SponsellerDepartment of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden. ryan.sponseller@umu.se.
Hjalmar LaudonDepartment of Forest Ecology and Management, SLU, Skogsmarksgränd, 901 83, Umeå, Sweden. hjalmar.laudon@slu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a framework for evaluating and communicating effects of human activity on water quality in managed forests. The framework is based on the following processes: atmospheric deposition, weathering, accumulation, recirculation and flux. Impairments to water quality are characterized in terms of their extent, longevity and frequency. Impacts are communicated using a "traffic lights" metaphor for characterizing severity of water quality impairments arising from forestry and other anthropogenic pressures. The most serious impairments to water quality in managed boreal forests include (i) forestry activities causing excessive sediment mobilization and extirpation of aquatic species and (ii) other anthropogenic pressures caused by long-range transport of mercury and acidifying pollutants. The framework and tool presented here can help evaluate, summarize and communicate the most important issues in circumstances where land management and other anthropogenic pressures combine to impair water quality and may also assist in implementing the "polluter pays" principle.

Indexed as

Water QualityConservation of Natural ResourcesEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental PolicyForestryForestsUncertaintyBorealEnvironmental communicationForestryWater quality

Identifiers

PMID26744053
PMCPMC4705064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.