ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016
Fast and accurate branch lengths estimation for phylogenomic trees.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiple drivers of genomic novelty across ruminants.iScience · 2026Article
- Species Tree Branch Length Estimation despite Incomplete Lineage Sorting, Duplication, and Loss.Genome biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Article
- Emergence and global spread of a dominant multidrug-resistant clade within Acinetobacter baumannii.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Article
- Review
- OrthoMaM v12: a database of curated single-copy ortholog alignments and trees to study mammalian evolutionary genomics.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Distributed genotyping and clustering of Neisseria strains reveal continual emergence of epidemic meningococcus over a century.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Phylogenomic branch length estimation using quartets.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Quintet Rooting: rooting species trees under the multi-species coalescent model.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Rhodopsin-bestrophin fusion proteins from unicellular algae form gigantic pentameric ion channels.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2022Article
- Article
- SWPhylo - A Novel Tool for Phylogenomic Inferences by Comparison of Oligonucleotide Patterns and Integration of Genome-Based and Gene-Based Phylogenetic Trees.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2018Article
- Comparative analysis of inverted repeats of polypod fern (Polypodiales) plastomes reveals two hypervariable regions.BMC plant biology · 2017Article
- Bad Clade Deletion Supertrees: A Fast and Accurate Supertree Algorithm.Molecular biology and evolution · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBranch lengths are an important attribute of phylogenetic trees, providing essential information for many studies in evolutionary biology. Yet, part of the current methodology to reconstruct a phylogeny from genomic information - namely supertree methods - focuses on the topology or structure of the phylogenetic tree, rather than the evolutionary divergences associated to it. Moreover, accurate methods to estimate branch lengths - typically based on probabilistic analysis of a concatenated alignment - are limited by large demands in memory and computing time, and may become impractical when the data sets are too large.
resultsHere, we present a novel phylogenomic distance-based method, named ERaBLE (Evolutionary Rates and Branch Length Estimation), to estimate the branch lengths of a given reference topology, and the relative evolutionary rates of the genes employed in the analysis. ERaBLE uses as input data a potentially very large collection of distance matrices, where each matrix is obtained from a different genomic region - either directly from its sequence alignment, or indirectly from a gene tree inferred from the alignment. Our experiments show that ERaBLE is very fast and fairly accurate when compared to other possible approaches for the same tasks. Specifically, it efficiently and accurately deals with large data sets, such as the OrthoMaM v8 database, composed of 6,953 exons from up to 40 mammals.
conclusionsERaBLE may be used as a complement to supertree methods - or it may provide an efficient alternative to maximum likelihood analysis of concatenated alignments - to estimate branch lengths from phylogenomic data sets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.