Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26743755›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2016

A cross-linked hyaluronic acid hydrogel (Healaflow(®)) as a novel vitreous substitute.

Henrik Barth, Sven Crafoord, Sten Andréasson, Fredrik Ghosh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Hydrogel-Based Vitreous Substitutes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Vitreous Substitutes as Drug Release Systems.Translational vision science & technology · 2022
    Review
  13. Hyaluronic Acid-PEG-Based Diels-AlderBiomacromolecules · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Henrik BarthDepartment of Ophthalmology, Lund University Hospital, BMC B11, S-22184, Lund, Sweden. henrik.barth@med.lu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4702-0626
Sven CrafoordDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.
Sten AndréassonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Lund University Hospital, BMC B11, S-22184, Lund, Sweden.
Fredrik GhoshDepartment of Ophthalmology, Lund University Hospital, BMC B11, S-22184, Lund, Sweden.
Lund University · SEÖrebro University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeVitrectomy requires the substitution of the natural vitreous, as well as tamponading of retinal breaks. Clinically available alternatives such as gas and silicone oil have side effects such as inflammation, secondary glaucoma, cataract, and a need for head posturing. In this study, a hydrogel of cross-linked sodium hyaluronic acid (Healaflow(®)) is evaluated for use as a novel vitreous substitute.

methodsA combined 25-20-gauge pars plana vitrectomy with posterior vitreous detachment was performed in the right eye of twelve pigmented rabbits, with subsequent injection of approximately 1 ml Healaflow(®). Clinical evaluation, measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP), and full-field ERG were performed postoperatively. The rabbits were sacrificed at different time-points between 42 and 105 days. After enucleation, the eyes were examined macroscopically, photographed, and prepared for histological examination with routine microscopy and immunohistochemistry.

resultsHealaflow(®) was successfully used with standard surgical procedures and remained translucent but did lose most of its viscosity during the postoperative period. One rabbit was lost due to unrelated causes. In two eyes iatrogenic partial retinal detachments were seen, and in two eyes significant cataract developed due to intra-operative complications. ERG-recordings revealed no toxic effect on rod or cone function. Routine microscopy and immunohistochemistry demonstrated normal morphology with some Müller cell activation (up-regulation of glial acidic fibrillary protein, GFAP) compared to unoperated eyes and no significant DNA-fragmentation (TUNEL-assay).

conclusionsHealaflow® did not affect retinal morphology or function negatively during long-term use as a vitreous substitute, making it highly interesting in this setting. An estimated retention time of a few weeks suggests potential for use as a short-term tamponade. Future work will include an increased ratio of cross-linking to prolong the structural integrity of the gel.

Indexed as

Artificial OrgansDisease Models, AnimalHyaluronic AcidVitrectomyVitreoretinal SurgeryVitreous BodyAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsButylene GlycolsCross-Linking ReagentsElectroretinographyHydrogelsRabbitsRetina1,4-bis(2,3-epoxypropoxy)butaneBiocompatible MaterialsButylene GlycolsCross-Linking ReagentsHyaluronic AcidHydrogelsHyaluronic acidImmunohistochemistryVitreoretinal surgeryVitreous substitute

Identifiers

PMID26743755
OpenAlexW2229037255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.