Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26743665›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2016

The Impact of Green House Adoption on Medicare Spending and Utilization.

David C Grabowski, Christopher C Afendulis, Daryl J Caudry, A James O'Malley, Peter Kemper, THRIVE Research Collaborative

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Organizational Context and Quality Indicators in Nursing Homes: A Microsystem Look.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Green House Adoption and Nursing Home Quality.Health services research · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David C GrabowskiDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Christopher C AfendulisDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Daryl J CaudryDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
A James O'MalleyGeisel School of Medicine, The Dartmouth Institute, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH.
Peter KemperThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
THRIVE Research Collaborative

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the impact of the Green House (GH) model of nursing home care on Medicare acute hospital, other hospital, skilled nursing facility, and hospice spending and utilization. DATA SOURCES/STUDY

settingMedicare claims and enrollment data from 2005 through 2010 merged with resident-level minimum data set (MDS) assessments. STUDY

designUsing a difference-in-differences framework, we compared Medicare Part A and hospice expenditures and utilization in 15 nursing homes that adopted the GH model relative to changes over the same time period in 223 matched nonadopting nursing homes. We applied the same method for residents of GH homes and for residents of "legacy" homes, the original nursing homes that stay open alongside the GH home(s). PRINCIPAL

findingsThe adoption of GH had no detectable impact on Medicare Part A (plus hospice) spending and utilization across all residents living in the nursing home. When we analyzed residents living in GH homes and legacy units separately, however, we found that the adoption of the GH model reduced overall annual Medicare Part A spending by $7,746 per resident, although this appeared to be partially offset by an increase in spending in legacy homes.

conclusionsTo the extent that the GH model reduces Medicare spending, adopting nursing homes do not receive any of the related Medicare savings under traditional payment mechanisms. New approaches that are currently being developed and piloted, which better align financial incentives for providers and payers, could incentivize greater adoption of the GH model.

Indexed as

Hospice CareHumansInsurance Claim ReviewMedicaidMedicareNursing HomesPatient-Centered CareUnited Statesculture changeGreen House nursing homeMedicare spendingNursing homes

Identifiers

PMID26743665
PMCPMC5338209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.