Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26743520›Full record

ArticleFunctional & integrative genomics2016

Identification and characterization of microRNAs in the plant parasitic root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita using deep sequencing.

Yanqiong Zhang, Yunsheng Wang, Fuliang Xie, Chao Li, Baohong Zhang, Robert L Nichols, Xiaoping Pan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Functional & integrative genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Tomato MicroRNAs and Their Functions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. MicroRNAs in model and complex organisms.Functional & integrative genomics · 2017
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yanqiong ZhangDepartment of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, 27858, USA.
Yunsheng WangCollege of Plant Protection, Hunan Agricultural University, Hunan, 410128, China.
Fuliang XieDepartment of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, 27858, USA.
Chao LiDepartment of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, 27858, USA.
Baohong ZhangDepartment of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, 27858, USA.
Robert L NicholsCotton Incorporated, Cary, NC, 27513, USA. BNichols@cottoninc.com.
Xiaoping PanDepartment of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, 27858, USA. Panx@ecu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita is among the most damaging plant-parasitic pests of several crops including cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and tomato (Lycopersicon escultentum). Recently, a genome has become available for M. incognita, which greatly facilitates investigation of the interactions between M. incognita and its plant hosts at the molecular level and enables formation of hypotheses concerning development at the cellular level. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of small RNA molecules that serve as endogenous gene regulators. They regulate many biological processes including reproduction, the sequencing of morphological development, and potentially of parasitism as well. Certain miRNAs regulate fundamental metabolism pathways and stress responses in M. incognita. Since a list of miRNAs has not been generated for M. incognita, we employed a bioinformatics tool called mirDeepFinder to identify miRNAs from the small RNA database of M. incognita (GSM611102) that was generated from deep sequencing. A total of 254 conserved miRNAs belonging to 161 miRNA families were identified, as were 35 novel miRNAs belonging to 31 families. The 16 most commonly found miRNAs in order of abundance were min-miR-100a, min-miR-124, min-miR-71a, min-miR-1, min-miR-228, min-miR-92, min-miR-72, min-miR-49b, min-miR-58, min-miR-252, min-miR-lin-4, min-miR-87, min-miR-2a, min-miR-34a, min-miR-50a, and min-miR-279a. The length of the pre-miRNAs varied greatly from 50 to 197 nt, with an average of 88 ± 39 nt. The average minimal folding free energy (MFE) and MFE index (MFEI) of the identified miRNAs were -30.3 Kcal/mol and 0.92, respectively, indicating that these miRNAs can readily fold into a typical hairpin secondary structure.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceComputational BiologyGene Expression RegulationGossypiumHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHost-Parasite InteractionsMicroRNAsMolecular Sequence AnnotationMolecular Sequence DataNucleic Acid ConformationPlant DiseasesPlant RootsRNA, HelminthSolanum lycopersicumThermodynamicsMicroRNAsRNA, HelminthCottonDeep sequencingMeloidogyne incognitaMicroRNARoot-knot nematode

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.