Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26742920›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2017

What is the diagnostic value of computed tomography tractography in patients with abdominal stab wounds?

H Uzunosmanoğlu, Ş K Çorbacıoğlu, Y Çevik, E Akıncı, Ç Hacıfazlıoğlu, A Yavuz, Y Yüzbaşıoğlu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. CT tractography in anterior abdominal stab wounds: a proposed algorithm.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2021
    Article
  3. Characteristics and management of penetrating abdominal injuries in a German level I trauma center.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2019
    Article
  4. Comment on "What is the diagnostic value of computed tomography tractography in patients with abdominal stab wounds?"European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H UzunosmanoğluDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Kecioren Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Ş K ÇorbacıoğluDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Kecioren Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. serefkeremcorbacioglu@gmail.com.
Y ÇevikDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Kecioren Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
E AkıncıDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Kecioren Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Ç HacıfazlıoğluDepartment of Radiology, Kecioren Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
A YavuzDepartment of General Surgery, General Surgery, Kecioren Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Y YüzbaşıoğluDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
S.B. Keçiören Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionComputed tomography (CT) tractography is a promising technique; it is a CT performed after an entire stab wound tract with a water-soluble contrast agent in patients with abdominal stab wounds. The aim of the current study was to investigate the diagnostic value of CT tractography and to compare with other radiodiagnostic tools in patients with abdominal stab wounds. MATERIALS AND

methodsAll of the patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds were retrospectively reviewed between January 2012 and December 2014. Included in this study for statistical analyses were patients who had contrast-enhanced (oral and intravenous, not rectal) abdominal CTs alone or had contrast-enhanced abdominal CTs combined the CT tractographies and laparotomies in the first 24 h. These patients were divided two groups: the CT scan group (patients who had abdominal CTs alone) and the CT tractography group (patients who had CT tractographies). Both groups underwent laparotomies. The endpoint of this study was to determine whether CT tractography predicted peritoneal violation, not requiring therapeutic laparotomy. The gold standard of diagnosis peritoneal violation was considered laparotomy (therapeutic or not therapeutic).

resultsA total of 102 patients with anterior abdomen stab wounds who had laparotomies were enrolled and 29 (27 %) of the patients were excluded for several causes in the study period. Finally, 73 of the patients were enrolled in this study for statistical analyses. The diagnostic performance of a CT tractography in detecting peritoneal violation resulted in 100 % sensitivity, 100 % specificity, 100 % positive predictive values (PPV), 100 % negative predictive values (NPV), and 100 % accuracy.

conclusionA CT tractography combined with an abdominal CT scan seems successful in detecting peritoneal violation in hemodynamically stable patients with abdominal stab wounds. Certainly, randomized controlled trials are required on this topic to recommend this as a routine diagnostic procedure.

Indexed as

Diffusion Tensor ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedAbdominal InjuriesFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedInjury Severity ScoreLaparotomyMalePredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityWounds, StabAbdominal stab woundsComputed tomographyCT tractographyPenetrating trauma

Identifiers

PMID26742920
OpenAlexW2223201145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.