ArticleClinical rheumatology2016
Poor renal outcomes in patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated crescentic glomerulonephritis and normal renal function at diagnosis.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Determinants of renal and patient outcomes in a Spanish cohort of patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis and renal involvement.Clinical rheumatology · 2018Article
- Predictors of Poor Outcome in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis (AAV).Current rheumatology reports · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to investigate the renal outcomes of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated crescentic glomerulonephritis in patients with normal estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at diagnosis. Twenty-seven patients with biopsy-proven ANCA-associated crescentic glomerulonephritis were retrospectively recruited and were divided into 12 with normal eGFR (≥60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) and 15 with low eGFR (<60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) at baseline. Clinical and renal pathological findings at diagnosis and renal outcomes for up to 3 years were compared between the two groups. Two patients in the low eGFR group died of severe bacterial pneumonia. In the normal eGFR group, the following characteristics were observed: younger age at diagnosis (p = 0.04), diagnosis of granulomatosis polyangiitis (GPA) (p < 0.01), and lower frequency of cyclophosphamide treatment (p = 0.03). On renal pathological analysis, the normal eGFR group had a significantly lower proportion of cellular crescent formation (p = 0.01), fibrinoid necrosis (p = 0.01), interstitial fibrosis (p = 0.02), and tubular atrophy (p = 0.02). As a result, the two groups did not significantly differ in remission rates, relapse rates, Birmingham vasculitis score, vasculitis damage index, or eGFR on 3-year follow-up. Patients with biopsy-proven ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis and normal eGFR at diagnosis have poor renal outcomes and may require standard intensive immunosuppressive treatment to prevent accrual of damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26742758What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.