Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26742709›Full record

ReviewJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2016

18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI Perform Equally Well in Cancer: Evidence from Studies on More Than 2,300 Patients.

Claudio Spick, Ken Herrmann, Johannes Czernin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. EANM practice guideline for quantitative SPECT-CT.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Diagnostic performance of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Prospective comparison ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019
    Trial
  7. Diagnostic impact of 18F-FDG PET/MRI over PET/CT in histiocytoses: a prospective comparative study.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Clinical PET/MR.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026
    Review
  10. Glucose and Lactate, Starters or Intermediates of Cancer Metabolic Rewiring.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  11. [American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Review
  12. Impact of pretreatment PET/MRI on radiooncologic target delineation in Hodgkin's lymphoma: a case series.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Feasibility Study for a Microstrip Transmission Line RF Coil Integrated with a PET Detector Module in a 7T Human MR Imaging System.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Comparison of PET/CT and PET/MRI in central nervous system tumors, a narrative review.International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology · 2024
    Review

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Claudio SpickAhmanson Translational Imaging Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California; and.
Ken HerrmannAhmanson Translational Imaging Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California; and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Johannes CzerninAhmanson Translational Imaging Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California; and jczernin@mednet.ucla.edu.

Funding

Women's CancersP30CA016042 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Samuel Wheeler French · 1985 to 2026
$134.5M
Transduction of Hematopoietic Stem Cells for Enhanced Immunotherapy of MelanomaP01CA132681 · NCI · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BALTIMORE, DAVID · 2010 to 2014
$14.4M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA132681NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(18)F-FDG PET/CT has become the reference standard in oncologic imaging against which the performance of other imaging modalities is measured. The promise of PET/MRI includes multiparametric imaging to further improve diagnosis and phenotyping of cancer. Rather than focusing on these capabilities, many investigators have examined whether (18)F-FDG PET combined with mostly anatomic MRI improves cancer staging and restaging. After a description of PET/MRI scanner designs and a discussion of technical and operational issues, we review the available literature to determine whether cancer assessments are improved with PET/MRI. The available data show that PET/MRI is feasible and performs as well as PET/CT in most types of cancer. Diagnostic advantages may be achievable in prostate cancer and in bone metastases, whereas disadvantages exist in lung nodule assessments. We conclude that (18)F-FDG PET/MRI and PET/CT provide comparable diagnostic information when MRI is used simply to provide the anatomic framework. Thus, PET/MRI could be used in lieu of PET/CT if this approach becomes economically viable and if reasonable workflows can be established. Future studies should explore the multiparametric potential of MRI.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingMultimodal ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyHumansNeoplasmsNeoplasm Stagingcancer diagnosisoncologyPET/CTPET/MRIstagingtherapy monitoring

Identifiers

PMID26742709
PMCPMC5003572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.