Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26742493›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2016

Tooth loss is associated with increased risk of esophageal cancer: evidence from a meta-analysis with dose-response analysis.

Qi-Lin Chen, Xian-Tao Zeng, Zhi-Xiao Luo, Xiao-Li Duan, Jie Qin, Wei-Dong Leng

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qi-Lin ChenDepartment of Stomatology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan 442000, Hubei Province, China.
Xian-Tao ZengDepartment of Stomatology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan 442000, Hubei Province, China.
Zhi-Xiao LuoDepartment of Stomatology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan 442000, Hubei Province, China.
Xiao-Li DuanDepartment of Digestive Medicine, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, 442000, P.R. China.
Jie QinDepartment of Stomatology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan 442000, Hubei Province, China.
Wei-Dong LengDepartment of Stomatology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan 442000, Hubei Province, China.
Hubei University of Medicine · CNTaihe Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidemiological studies have revealed the association between tooth loss and the risk of esophageal cancer (EC); however, consistent results were not obtained from different single studies. Therefore, we conducted the present meta-analysis to evaluate the association between tooth loss and EC. We conducted electronic searches of PubMed until to February 10, 2015 to identify relevant observational studies that examined the association between tooth loss and the risk of EC. Study selection and data extraction from eligible studies were independently performed by two authors. The meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 12.0 software. Finally eight eligible publications with ten studies involving 3 cohort studies, 5 case-control studies, and 1 cross-sectional study were yielded. Meta-analysis identified tooth loss increased risk of EC 1.30 times (Relative risk = 1.30, 95% confidence interval = 1.06-1.60, I(2) = 13.5%). Dose-response analysis showed linear relationship between tooth loss and risk of EC (RR = 1.01, 95%CI = 1.00-1.03; P for non-linearity test was 0.45). Subgroup analysis proved similar results and publication bias was not detected. In conclusion, tooth loss could be considered to be a significant and dependent risk factor for EC based on the current evidence.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesEsophageal NeoplasmsHumansPrognosisRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTooth Loss

Identifiers

PMID26742493
PMCPMC4705514
OpenAlexW2413087762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.