Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26742008›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of cancer2016

Antibody-drug conjugates--an emerging class of cancer treatment.

Nikolaos Diamantis, Udai Banerji

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 255 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
255citing papers in PubMed
33.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

255 citing papers in PubMed, 513 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. [Advances in intravesical therapy for nonZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Investigation of Antibody-Drug Conjugates by Mass Spectrometry.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

195 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nikolaos DiamantisDrug Development Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden, Downs Road, Sutton, London SM2 5PT, UK.
Udai BanerjiDrug Development Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden, Downs Road, Sutton, London SM2 5PT, UK.
Institute of Cancer Research · GBRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are an emerging novel class of anticancer treatment agents that combines the selectivity of targeted treatment with the cytotoxic potency of chemotherapy drugs. New linker technology associated with novel highly potent cytotoxic payloads has permitted the development of more effective and safe ADCs. In recent years, two ADCs have been licensed, T-DM1 and brentuximab vedotin, and are already establishing their place in cancer treatment. A plethora of ADCs are being investigated in phases I and II trials, emerging data of which appears promising. As we deepen our understanding of what makes a successful ADC, an increasing number of ADCs will likely become viable treatment options as single agents or in combination with chemotherapy. This review will present the philosophy underlying ADCs, their main characteristics and current research developments with a focus on ADCs in solid tumours.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalHumansImmunoconjugatesNeoplasmsAntibodies, MonoclonalImmunoconjugates

Identifiers

PMID26742008
PMCPMC4815767
OpenAlexW2226317100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.