Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26741997›Full record

SynthesisPreventing chronic disease2016

Physical Activity-Related Policy and Environmental Strategies to Prevent Obesity in Rural Communities: A Systematic Review of the Literature, 2002-2013.

M Renée Umstattd Meyer, Cynthia K Perry, Jasmin C Sumrall, Megan S Patterson, Shana M Walsh, Stephanie C Clendennen, Steven P Hooker, Kelly R Evenson, Karin V Goins, Katie M Heinrich and 5 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Preventing chronic disease, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Movement Behaviour and Health Outcomes in Rural Children: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Rural physical activity interventions in the United States: a systematic review and RE-AIM evaluation.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

M Renée Umstattd MeyerBaylor University, Robbins College of Health and Human Sciences, Department of Health, Human Performance and Recreation, One Bear Place No. 97313, Waco, TX 76798. Email: Renee_Umstattd@Baylor.edu.
Cynthia K PerrySchool of Nursing Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Jasmin C SumrallRobbins College of Health and Human Sciences, Baylor University, Waco, Texas.
Megan S PattersonBaylor University, Waco, Texas.
Shana M WalshRobbins College of Health and Human Sciences, Baylor University, Waco, Texas.
Stephanie C ClendennenRobbins College of Health and Human Sciences, Baylor University, Waco, Texas.
Steven P HookerArizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona.
Kelly R EvensonUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Karin V GoinsUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
Katie M HeinrichKansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas.
Nancy O'Hara TompkinsWest Virginia Prevention Research Center, West Virginia University, Charleston, West Virginia.
Amy A EylerPrevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
Sydney JonesUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Rachel TabakPrevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
Cheryl ValkoPrevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
Baylor University · USWashington University in St. Louis · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USArizona State University · USKansas State University · USOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USWest Virginia University · US

Funding

Cardiovascular Epidemiology Training GrantT32HL007055 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Wayne D. Rosamond · 1986 to 2026
$10.0M
HPDPRC SIP 13-66U48DP001903 · DP · SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY · PI BAKER, ELIZABETH A · 2009 to 2013
$7.3M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP001903NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48/DP001903NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHealth disparities exist between rural and urban residents; in particular, rural residents have higher rates of chronic diseases and obesity. Evidence supports the effectiveness of policy and environmental strategies to prevent obesity and promote health equity. In 2009, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended 24 policy and environmental strategies for use by local communities: the Common Community Measures for Obesity Prevention (COCOMO); 12 strategies focus on physical activity. This review was conducted to synthesize evidence on the implementation, relevance, and effectiveness of physical activity-related policy and environmental strategies for obesity prevention in rural communities.

methodsA literature search was conducted in PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, CINHAL, and PAIS databases for articles published from 2002 through May 2013 that reported findings from physical activity-related policy or environmental interventions conducted in the United States or Canada. Each article was extracted independently by 2 researchers.

resultsOf 2,002 articles, 30 articles representing 26 distinct studies met inclusion criteria. Schools were the most common setting (n = 18 studies). COCOMO strategies were applied in rural communities in 22 studies; the 2 most common COCOMO strategies were "enhance infrastructure supporting walking" (n = 11) and "increase opportunities for extracurricular physical activity" (n = 9). Most studies (n = 21) applied at least one of 8 non-COCOMO strategies; the most common was increasing physical activity opportunities at school outside of physical education (n = 8). Only 14 studies measured or reported physical activity outcomes (10 studies solely used self-report); 10 reported positive changes.

conclusionSeven of the 12 COCOMO physical activity-related strategies were successfully implemented in 2 or more studies, suggesting that these 7 strategies are relevant in rural communities and the other 5 might be less applicable in rural communities. Further research using robust study designs and measurement is needed to better ascertain implementation success and effectiveness of COCOMO and non-COCOMO strategies in rural communities.

Indexed as

ExercisePublic PolicyRural PopulationHumansObesityUnited States

Identifiers

PMID26741997
PMCPMC4707945
OpenAlexW2139448890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.