Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26741702›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Interface Management between General Practitioners and Rheumatologists-Results of a Survey Defining a Concept for Future Joint Recommendations.

Rudolf Puchner, Michael Edlinger, Erich Mur, Gabriele Eberl, Manfred Herold, Peter Kufner, Antonia Puchner, Stephan E Puchner, Kurt Redlich, Alois Alkin and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Rheumatology in Austria].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
  8. The patients' perspective: living with lupus in Austria.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rudolf PuchnerRheumatology Practise Dr Puchner, Wels, Austria.
Michael EdlingerDepartment of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Health Economics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Erich MurDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck Austria.
Gabriele EberlKlinikum Malcherhof Baden, Baden bei Wien, Austria.
Manfred HeroldDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck Austria.
Peter KufnerPrivate Practise Dr Kufner, Innsbruck, Austria.
Antonia PuchnerDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Stephan E PuchnerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Kurt RedlichDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Alois AlkinCentre of Excellence in Medicine, Linz, Austria.
Klaus MacholdDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATInnsbruck Medical University · ATUniversität Innsbruck · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo measure the views of general practitioners (GPs) and rheumatologists in a nationwide evaluation, so as to optimise their cooperation in managing patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases.

methodsA questionnaire covering aspects of collaboration was sent, both by mail and/or by email, to all GPs and rheumatologists in Austria. Topics covered were (i) examinations and interventions to be performed before referral, (ii) the spectrum of diseases to be referred, and (iii) the role of GPs in follow-up and continuous management of patients.

results1,229 GPs of the 4,016 GPs (31%) and 110 of the 180 rheumatologists (61%) responded to the questionnaire. In cases of suspected arthritis, 99% of the GPs and 92% of the rheumatologists recommended specific laboratory tests, and 92% and 70%, respectively, recommended X-rays of affected joints before referral. Rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis, psoriatic arthritis and connective tissue disease were unanimously seen as indications for referral to a rheumatologist. Only 12% of rheumatologists felt responsible for the treatment of hand osteoarthritis and fibromyalgia. 80% of GPs and 85% of rheumatologists were of the opinion that treatment with disease-modifying drugs should be initiated by a specialist. Subsequent drug prescription and administration by GPs was supported by a majority of GPs and rheumatologists, with a concomitant rheumatologist follow-up every three to six months.

conclusionThe considerable consensus between the two professional groups constitutes a solid base for future joint recommendations, with the aim to accelerate the diagnostic process and the initiation of adequate therapy.

Indexed as

Interprofessional RelationsAgedArthritis, PsoriaticArthritis, RheumatoidAustriaDisease ManagementDrug PrescriptionsFemaleFibromyalgiaGeneral PractitionersHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritisPractice Patterns, Physicians'Radiography

Identifiers

PMID26741702
PMCPMC4704827
OpenAlexW2223278297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.