ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2016
Maternal and neonatal outcomes in obese women who lose weight during pregnancy.
Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neonates at Risk: Understanding the Impact of High-Risk Pregnancies on Neonatal Health.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Weight Loss, Stability, and Low Weight Gain during Pregnancy among Individuals with Obesity: Associations with Adverse Perinatal Outcomes: An Observational Study.American journal of perinatology · 2024Observational
- Adverse Perinatal Outcomes Associated with Increasing Maternal Obesity.American journal of perinatology · 2024Observational
- Pre-pregnancy BMI, rate of gestational weight gain, and preterm birth among US Pacific Islander individuals.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2024Article
- Gestational Weight Gain and Small for Gestational Age in Obese Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of endocrinology · 2023Review
- Diagnosing Arterial Stiffness in Pregnancy and Its Implications in the Cardio-Renal-Metabolic Chain.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Atlantic DIP: is weight gain less than that recommended by IOM safe in obese women with gestational diabetes mellitus?International journal of obesity (2005) · 2021Article
- An evaluation of whether a gestational weight gain of 5 to 9 kg for obese women optimizes maternal and neonatal health risks.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2019Article
- Article
- Avoiding excessive pregnancy weight gain to obtain better pregnancy outcomes in Taiwan.Medicine · 2018Article
- Maternal and neonatal demographics of macrosomic infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2017Article
- Is it appropriate for Korean women to adopt the 2009 Institute of Medicine recommendations for gestational weight gain?PloS one · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate neonatal and maternal outcomes in obese pregnant women whose weight gain differed from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations. STUDY
designMaternal and neonatal outcomes associated with weight change in pregnancy were retrospectively investigated in women with obesity (body mass index (BMI) ⩾30 kg m(-2); N=10734) who gave birth at 12 hospitals. Using a 1:1:1:1 design (n=778 matched groups), we matched women with obesity who lost, maintained, gained appropriate (IOM recommended) and gained excessive weight during pregnancy by gestational age at delivery, maternal age, race/ethnicity, prepregnancy BMI, chronic hypertension, pregestational diabetes and smoking status. Regression techniques were used to adjust for confounders and compare outcomes across weight change categories.
resultCompared with IOM recommendations, weight loss was associated with twofold greater odds of low birth weight infants and a mean decrease in estimated blood loss of 30 ml; excessive weight gain was associated with doubled odds of gestational hypertension or preeclampsia, fourfold greater odds of macrosomia and a mean decrease in 5-min APGAR of 0.09. From lost to excessively gained weight, the odds of cesarean delivery increased 1.4 times and mean infant birth weight increased by 197 g. In contrast, the odds of small-for-gestational age were 1.8 times greater for women who lost than gained excessive weight.
conclusionWeight loss in obese pregnant women is associated with increased risk for low birth weight neonates but significantly decreased or maintained risk for other maternal and neonatal morbidities, as compared with appropriate or excessive weight gain. This study supports re-evaluation of the current IOM guidelines for women with obesity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.