Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26741533›Full record

ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2016

A comparison of stress in cracked fibrous tissue specimens with varied crack location, loading, and orientation using finite element analysis.

John M Peloquin, Dawn M Elliott

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Structural, compositional, and functional effects of blunt and sharp cartilage damage on the joint: A 9-month equine groove model study.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2021
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Structure, function, and defect tolerance with maturation of the radial tie fiber network in the knee meniscus.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John M PeloquinUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Dawn M ElliottUniversity of Delaware, 150 Academy St, 161 Colburn Lab, Newark, DE 19716, USA. Electronic address: delliott@udel.edu.

Funding

Disc Mechanics and Altered Loading in DegenerationR01AR050052 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ELLIOTT, DAWN M · 2005 to 2024
$4.7M
Multi-scale biomechanics of engineered and native fibrous load-bearing tissueR01EB002425 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ELLIOTT, DAWN M, MAUCK, ROBERT L · 2003 to 2017
$4.1M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR050052NIAMS NIH HHS R01AR050052NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB002425NIBIB NIH HHS R01EB002425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cracks in fibrous soft tissue, such as intervertebral disc annulus fibrosus and knee meniscus, cause pain and compromise joint mechanics. A crack concentrates stress at its tip, making further failure and crack extension (fracture) more likely. Ex vivo mechanical testing is an important tool for studying the loading conditions required for crack extension, but prior work has shown that it is difficult to reproduce crack extension. Most prior work used edge crack specimens in uniaxial tension, with the crack 90° to the edge of the specimen. This configuration does not necessarily represent the loading conditions that cause in vivo crack extension. To find a potentially better choice for experiments aiming to reproduce crack extension, we used finite element analysis to compare, in factorial combination, (1) center crack vs. edge crack location, (2) biaxial vs. uniaxial loading, and (3) crack-fiber angles ranging from 0° to 90°. The simulated material was annulus fibrosus fibrocartilage with a single fiber family. We hypothesized that one of the simulated test cases would produce a stronger stress concentration than the commonly used uniaxially loaded 90° crack-fiber angle edge crack case. Stress concentrations were compared between cases in terms of fiber-parallel stress (representing risk of fiber rupture), fiber-perpendicular stress (representing risk of matrix rupture), and fiber shear stress (representing risk of fiber sliding). Fiber-perpendicular stress and fiber shear stress concentrations were greatest in edge crack specimens (of any crack-fiber angle) and center crack specimens with a 90° crack-fiber angle. However, unless the crack is parallel to the fiber direction, these stress components alone are insufficient to cause crack opening and extension. Fiber-parallel stress concentrations were greatest in center crack specimens with a 45° crack-fiber angle, either biaxially or uniaxially loaded. We therefore recommend that the 45° center crack case be tried in future experiments intended to study crack extension by fiber rupture.

Indexed as

Finite Element AnalysisMaterials TestingStress, MechanicalLikelihood FunctionsRisk AssessmentShear StrengthWeight-BearingCrack propagationFibrocartilageFinite element analysisTensile testing

Identifiers

PMID26741533
PMCPMC4798902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.