Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26741410›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2016

Expanding the genetic counseling workforce: program directors' views on increasing the size of genetic counseling graduate programs.

Vivian Pan, Beverly M Yashar, Rachel Pothast, Catherine Wicklund

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The composition and capacity of the clinical genetics workforce in high-income countries: a scoping review.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Access to Genetic Counselors in the Southern United States.Journal of personalized medicine · 2019
    Article
  18. Internet Versus Virtual Reality Settings for Genomics Information Provision.Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vivian PanNorthwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1666-9273
Beverly M YasharUniversity of Michigan, Department of Human Genetics, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0807-3258
Rachel PothastNorthwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9847-3508
Catherine WicklundNorthwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5725-2872

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough there is an anticipated need for more genetic counselors, little is known about limitations at the graduate training level. We evaluated opportunities for growth of the genetic counseling (GC) workforce by exploring program directors' perspectives on increasing number of graduate trainees.

methodsThirty US-based GC program directors (PDs) were recruited through the Association of Genetic Counseling Program Directors' listserv. Online surveys and semistructured phone interviews were used to explore factors impacting the expansion of the GC workforce.

resultsTwenty-five PDs completed the survey; 18 interviews were conducted. Seventy-three percent said they believe that the workforce is growing too slowly and the number of graduates should increase. Attitudes were mixed regarding whether the job market should be the main factor driving workforce expansion. Thematic analysis of transcripts identified barriers to program expansion in six categories: funding, accreditation requirements, clinical sites, faculty availability, applicant pool, and physical space.

conclusionGeneral consensus among participants indicates the importance of increasing the capacity of the GC workforce pipeline. Addressing funding issues, examining current accreditation requirements, and reevaluating current education models may be effective strategies to expanding GC program size. Future research on increasing the number of GC programs and a needs assessment for GC services are suggested.Genet Med 18 8, 842-849.

Indexed as

Genetic CounselingEducation, Medical, GraduateHumansInternship and ResidencyPhysician ExecutivesSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID26741410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.