ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2015
Quantifying brain tissue volume in multiple sclerosis with automated lesion segmentation and filling.
Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Commercial volumetric MRI reporting tools in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of the evidence.Neuroradiology · 2023Pooled it
- Identifying sources of bias when testing three available algorithms for quantifying white matter lesions: BIANCA, LPA and LGA.GeroScience · 2025Article
- Systemic inflammation associates with and precedes cord atrophy in progressive multiple sclerosis.Brain communications · 2024Article
- Abnormal functional connectivity in radiologically isolated syndrome: A resting-state fMRI study.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2023Article
- Cocaine use is associated with cerebral white matter hyperintensities in HIV disease.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2023Article
- Overestimation of grey matter atrophy in glioblastoma patients following radio(chemo)therapy.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Ultrafast Wave-Controlled Aliasing in Parallel Imaging 3D-FLAIR in the Visualization and Volumetric Estimation of Cerebral White Matter Lesions.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2021Article
- Beware of white matter hyperintensities causing systematic errors in FreeSurfer gray matter segmentations!Human brain mapping · 2021Article
- Frontal White Matter Hyperintensities Effect on Default Mode Network Connectivity in Acute Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Article
- Repeatability and reproducibility of FreeSurfer, FSL-SIENAX and SPM brain volumetric measurements and the effect of lesion filling in multiple sclerosis.European radiology · 2019Article
- Review
- Longitudinal Changes in Diffusion Tensor Imaging Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Correlation With Outcome.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2019Article
- Cortical Microinfarcts and White Matter Connectivity in Memory Clinic Patients.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Article
- Automated segmentation of changes in FLAIR-hyperintense white matter lesions in multiple sclerosis on serial magnetic resonance imaging.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2019Article
- Relationship between episodic memory and volume of the brain regions of two functional cortical memory systems in multiple sclerosis.Journal of neurology · 2018Article
- Outcome Measures for Central Nervous System Evaluation in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1 May Be Confounded by Deficits in Motor Function or Insight.Frontiers in neurology · 2018Article
- Effects of Systolic Blood Pressure on Brain Integrity in Multiple Sclerosis.Frontiers in neurology · 2018Article
- Mental speed is associated with the shape irregularity of white matter MRI hyperintensity load.Brain imaging and behavior · 2017Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lesion filling has been successfully applied to reduce the effect of hypo-intense T1-w Multiple Sclerosis (MS) lesions on automatic brain tissue segmentation. However, a study of fully automated pipelines incorporating lesion segmentation and lesion filling on tissue volume analysis has not yet been performed. Here, we analyzed the % of error introduced by automating the lesion segmentation and filling processes in the tissue segmentation of 70 clinically isolated syndrome patient images. First of all, images were processed using the LST and SLS toolkits with different pipeline combinations that differed in either automated or manual lesion segmentation, and lesion filling or masking out lesions. Then, images processed following each of the pipelines were segmented into gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) using SPM8, and compared with the same images where expert lesion annotations were filled before segmentation. Our results showed that fully automated lesion segmentation and filling pipelines reduced significantly the % of error in GM and WM volume on images of MS patients, and performed similarly to the images where expert lesion annotations were masked before segmentation. In all the pipelines, the amount of misclassified lesion voxels was the main cause in the observed error in GM and WM volume. However, the % of error was significantly lower when automatically estimated lesions were filled and not masked before segmentation. These results are relevant and suggest that LST and SLS toolboxes allow the performance of accurate brain tissue volume measurements without any kind of manual intervention, which can be convenient not only in terms of time and economic costs, but also to avoid the inherent intra/inter variability between manual annotations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.