Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26740916›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2015

Highly adaptive tests for group differences in brain functional connectivity.

Junghi Kim, Wei Pan, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bayesian Joint Modeling of Multiple Brain Functional Networks.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Junghi KimDivision of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Wei PanDivision of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
Neuropathology CoreP30AG013846 · NIA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI KOWALL, NEIL W. · 1996 to 2020
$29.1M
UC Davis Alzheimer's Disease Core CenterP30AG010129 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI MEYER, OANH L · 1991 to 2020
$28.3M
Association analysis of rare variants with sequencing dataR01HL116720 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PAN, WEI, WEI, PENG · 2013 to 2020
$3.3M
Powerful Inference and Prediction for Genetic AssociationR01HL105397 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PAN, WEI, SHEN, XIAOTONG TOM · 2011 to 2018
$2.9M
New Machine Learning Tools for Biomedical DataR01GM081535 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PAN, WEI, SHEN, XIAOTONG TOM · 2007 to 2014
$2.2M
The University of Rochester Clinical and Translational Science InstituteTL1TR000096 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI BENNETT, NANCY M, KIEBURTZ, KARL D. · 2012 to 2015
$930k
Statistical Methods for Genomic DataR01GM113250 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PAN, WEI · 2014 to 2017
$702k
"MR Morphometrics and Cognitive Decline Rate in Large-Scale Aging Studies"K01AG030514 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CARMICHAEL, OWEN T. · 2008 to 2012
$495k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL105397NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL105397NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL116720NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL116720NIA NIH HHS K01 AG030514NIA NIH HHS P30 AG010129NIA NIH HHS P30 AG013846NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081535NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM081535NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM113250NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM113250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) and other technologies have been offering evidence and insights showing that altered brain functional networks are associated with neurological illnesses such as Alzheimer's disease. Exploring brain networks of clinical populations compared to those of controls would be a key inquiry to reveal underlying neurological processes related to such illnesses. For such a purpose, group-level inference is a necessary first step in order to establish whether there are any genuinely disrupted brain subnetworks. Such an analysis is also challenging due to the high dimensionality of the parameters in a network model and high noise levels in neuroimaging data. We are still in the early stage of method development as highlighted by Varoquaux and Craddock (2013) that "there is currently no unique solution, but a spectrum of related methods and analytical strategies" to learn and compare brain connectivity. In practice the important issue of how to choose several critical parameters in estimating a network, such as what association measure to use and what is the sparsity of the estimated network, has not been carefully addressed, largely because the answers are unknown yet. For example, even though the choice of tuning parameters in model estimation has been extensively discussed in the literature, as to be shown here, an optimal choice of a parameter for network estimation may not be optimal in the current context of hypothesis testing. Arbitrarily choosing or mis-specifying such parameters may lead to extremely low-powered tests. Here we develop highly adaptive tests to detect group differences in brain connectivity while accounting for unknown optimal choices of some tuning parameters. The proposed tests combine statistical evidence against a null hypothesis from multiple sources across a range of plausible tuning parameter values reflecting uncertainty with the unknown truth. These highly adaptive tests are not only easy to use, but also high-powered robustly across various scenarios. The usage and advantages of these novel tests are demonstrated on an Alzheimer's disease dataset and simulated data.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseBrainBrain MappingComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleCovariance matrixGraphical lassoNBSPrecision matrixrs-fMRISparse estimationSPU testsStatistical power

Identifiers

PMID26740916
PMCPMC4644249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.