Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26740820›Full record

ArticleMolecular cytogenetics2016

Monoallelic and biallelic deletions of 13q14 in a group of CLL/SLL patients investigated by CGH Haematological Cancer and SNP array (8x60K).

Beata Grygalewicz, Renata Woroniecka, Jolanta Rygier, Klaudia Borkowska, Iwona Rzepecka, Martyna Łukasik, Agnieszka Budziłowska, Grzegorz Rymkiewicz, Katarzyna Błachnio, Beata Nowakowska and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cytogenetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. ComplexInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A comprehensive flow-cytometry-based immunophenotypic characterization of Burkitt-like lymphoma with 11q aberration.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Beata GrygalewiczCancer Genetic Laboratory, Pathology and Laboratory Diagnostics Department, Centre of Oncology, M. Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Institute, Warsaw, Poland ; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Diagnostics, Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, 15B Wawelska Str, 02-034, Warsaw, Poland.
Renata WoronieckaCancer Genetic Laboratory, Pathology and Laboratory Diagnostics Department, Centre of Oncology, M. Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Jolanta RygierCancer Genetic Laboratory, Pathology and Laboratory Diagnostics Department, Centre of Oncology, M. Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Klaudia BorkowskaCancer Genetic Laboratory, Pathology and Laboratory Diagnostics Department, Centre of Oncology, M. Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Iwona RzepeckaCancer Genetic Laboratory, Pathology and Laboratory Diagnostics Department, Centre of Oncology, M. Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Martyna ŁukasikCancer Genetic Laboratory, Pathology and Laboratory Diagnostics Department, Centre of Oncology, M. Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Agnieszka BudziłowskaCancer Genetic Laboratory, Pathology and Laboratory Diagnostics Department, Centre of Oncology, M. Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Grzegorz RymkiewiczFlow Cytometry Laboratory, Pathology and Laboratory Diagnostics Department, Centre of Oncology, M. Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Katarzyna BłachnioFlow Cytometry Laboratory, Pathology and Laboratory Diagnostics Department, Centre of Oncology, M. Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Beata NowakowskaDepartment of Medical Genetics, Mother and Child Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Magdalena BartnikDepartment of Medical Genetics, Mother and Child Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Monika GosDepartment of Medical Genetics, Mother and Child Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Barbara Pieńkowska-GrelaCancer Genetic Laboratory, Pathology and Laboratory Diagnostics Department, Centre of Oncology, M. Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeletion of 13q14 is the most common cytogenetic change in chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) and is detected in about 50 % of patients by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), which can reveal presence of del(13)(q14) and mono- or biallelic deletion status without information about the size of the lost region. Array-comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) can detect submicroscopic copy number changes, loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and uniparental disomy (UPD) regions. The purpose of this study was detection of the size of del(13)(q14) deletion in our group of patients, comparing the size of the monoallelic and biallelic deletions, detection of LOH and UPD regions.

resultsWe have investigated 40 CLL/SLL patients by karyotype, FISH and CGH and SNP array. Mutational status was of immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable-region (IGVH) was also examined. The size of deletion ranged from 348,12 Kb to 38.97 Mb. Detected minimal deleted region comprised genes: TRIM13, miR-3613, KCNRG, DLEU2, miR-16-1, miR-15a, DLEU1. The RB1 deletions were detected in 41 % of cases. The average size in monoallelic 13q14 deletion group was 7,2 Mb while in biallelic group was 4,8 Mb. In two cases 13q14 deletions were located in the bigger UPD regions.

conclusionsOur results indicate that bigger deletion including RB1 or presence of biallelic 13q14 deletion is not sufficient to be considered as adverse prognostic factor in CLL/SLL. CytoSure Haematological Cancer and SNP array (8x60k) can precisely detect recurrent copy number changes with known prognostic significance in CLL/SLL as well as other chromosomal imbalances. The big advantage of this array is simultaneous detection of LOH and UPD regions during the same test.

Indexed as

13q14 deletionCGH and SNP arrayCLL/SLLUPD

Identifiers

PMID26740820
PMCPMC4702365
OpenAlexW2225166273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.