Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26740659›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016

Direct Evidence for Daily Plasticity of Electrical Coupling between Rod Photoreceptors in the Mammalian Retina.

Nan Ge Jin, Christophe P Ribelayga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The dynamic receptive fields of retinal ganglion cells.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nan Ge JinRuiz Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, and.
Christophe P RibelaygaRuiz Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, and Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Program in Neuroscience, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, and Neuroscience Research Center, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas 77030 Christophe.p.ribelayga@uth.tmc.edu.

Funding

VISION RESEARCHP30EY010608 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MASSEY, STEPHEN C · 1994 to 2014
$7.9M
Circadian Clock Function in the Mammalian RetinaR01EY018640 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI RIBELAYGA, CHRISTOPHE P. · 2009 to 2015
$2.0M
NEI NIH HHS EY010608NEI NIH HHS EY018640NEI NIH HHS P30 EY010608NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018640
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rod photoreceptors are electrically coupled through gap junctions. Coupling is a key determinant of their light response properties, but whether rod electrical coupling is dynamically regulated remains elusive and controversial. Here, we have obtained direct measurements of the conductance between adjacent rods in mouse retina and present evidence that rod electrical coupling strength is dependent on the time of day, the lighting conditions, and the mouse strain. Specifically, we show in CBA/Ca mice that under circadian conditions, the rod junctional conductance has a median value of 98 pS during the subjective day and of 493 pS during the subjective night. In C57BL/6 mice, the median junctional conductance between dark-adapted rods is ∼140 pS, regardless of the time in the circadian cycle. Adaptation to bright light decreases the rod junctional conductance to ∼0 pS, regardless of the time of day or the mouse strain. Together, these results establish the high degree of plasticity of rod electrical coupling over the course of the day. Estimates of the rod coupling strength will provide a foundation for further investigations of rod interactions and the role of rod coupling in the ability of the visual system to anticipate, assimilate, and respond to the daily changes in ambient light intensity. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Many cells in the CNS communicate via gap junctions, or electrical synapses, the regulation of which remains largely unknown. Here, we show that the strength of electrical coupling between rod photoreceptors of the retina is regulated by the time of day and the lighting conditions. This mechanism may help us understand some key aspects of day and night vision as well as some visual malfunctions.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsCells, CulturedCircadian RhythmFemaleGap JunctionsMaleMiceNerve NetNeuronal PlasticityRetinal Rod Photoreceptor CellsSynaptic Transmissionadaptationcircadian clockelectrical couplinggap junctionsphotoreceptorsretina

Identifiers

PMID26740659
PMCPMC4701958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.