ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016
Mild Perceptual Categorization Deficits Follow Bilateral Removal of Anterior Inferior Temporal Cortex in Rhesus Monkeys.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thalamocortical regulation of prefrontal stability enables abstract rule generalization.Science advances · 2026Article
- Enhanced neural plasticity in monkey TE compared to TEO during learning of a feature-ambiguous visual categorization task.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Editorial: Neural correlates of visual learning and object representation in inferior temporal lobe.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2025Article
- Neural Correlates of Category Learning in Monkey Inferior Temporal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Insights from the Evolving Model of Two Cortical Visual Pathways.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2024Review
- Article
- Object recognition in primates: what can early visual areas contribute?Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2024Article
- Dissociation between area TE and rhinal cortex in accuracy vs. speed of visual categorization in rhesus monkeys.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2024Article
- Differences in category information processing between areas TEO and TE of the macaque.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2024Article
- Neural correlates of category learning in monkey inferior temporal cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Visual recognition in rhesus monkeys requires area TE but not TEO.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- Local features drive identity responses in macaque anterior face patches.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Comparing performance between a deep neural network and monkeys with bilateral removals of visual area TE in categorizing feature-ambiguous stimuli.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2022Article
- The visual prefrontal cortex of anthropoids: interaction with temporal cortex in decision making and its role in the making of "visual animals".Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2021Article
- Contributions of the Monkey Inferior Temporal Areas TE and TEO to Visual Categorization.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2021Article
- Emergence of abstract rules in the primate brain.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2020Review
- Perceptual processing in the ventral visual stream requires area TE but not rhinal cortex.eLife · 2018Article
- The Organization and Operation of Inferior Temporal Cortex.Annual review of vision science · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In primates, visual recognition of complex objects depends on the inferior temporal lobe. By extension, categorizing visual stimuli based on similarity ought to depend on the integrity of the same area. We tested three monkeys before and after bilateral anterior inferior temporal cortex (area TE) removal. Although mildly impaired after the removals, they retained the ability to assign stimuli to previously learned categories, e.g., cats versus dogs, and human versus monkey faces, even with trial-unique exemplars. After the TE removals, they learned in one session to classify members from a new pair of categories, cars versus trucks, as quickly as they had learned the cats versus dogs before the removals. As with the dogs and cats, they generalized across trial-unique exemplars of cars and trucks. However, as seen in earlier studies, these monkeys with TE removals had difficulty learning to discriminate between two simple black and white stimuli. These results raise the possibility that TE is needed for memory of simple conjunctions of basic features, but that it plays only a small role in generalizing overall configural similarity across a large set of stimuli, such as would be needed for perceptual categorical assignment. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The process of seeing and recognizing objects is attributed to a set of sequentially connected brain regions stretching forward from the primary visual cortex through the temporal lobe to the anterior inferior temporal cortex, a region designated area TE. Area TE is considered the final stage for recognizing complex visual objects, e.g., faces. It has been assumed, but not tested directly, that this area would be critical for visual generalization, i.e., the ability to place objects such as cats and dogs into their correct categories. Here, we demonstrate that monkeys rapidly and seemingly effortlessly categorize large sets of complex images (cats vs dogs, cars vs trucks), surprisingly, even after removal of area TE, leaving a puzzle about how this generalization is done.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.