Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26740606›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2016

Lost to the NHS: a mixed methods study of why GPs leave practice early in England.

Natasha Doran, Fiona Fox, Karen Rodham, Gordon Taylor, Michael Harris

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
36.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 143 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Addressing the crisis of GP recruitment and retention: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Watching you wear out: Time as clinical labor.Medical anthropology quarterly · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Understanding persistent GP turnover using work and personal characteristics: a retrospective observational study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Observational
  11. GP workforce sustainability to maximise effective and equitable patient care: a realist review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Review
  12. Counting general practitioners: a comparative repeat cross-sectional analysis of GPs in NHS general practice in England.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Retaining family physicians in comprehensive primary care: Scoping review.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Natasha DoranDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath; senior research fellow, South West Academic Health Science Network (SWAHSN), Exeter.
Fiona FoxNIHR Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) West, University of Bristol, Bristol.
Karen RodhamStaffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent.
Gordon TaylorDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath.
Michael HarrisDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath.
University of Bath · GBUniversity of Staffordshire · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe loss of GPs in the early stages of their careers is contributing to the GP workforce crisis. Recruitment in the UK remains below the numbers needed to support the demand for GP care.

aimTo explore the reasons why GPs leave general practice early. DESIGN AND

settingA mixed methods study using online survey data triangulated with qualitative interviews.

methodParticipants were GPs aged <50 years who had left the English Medical Performers List in the last 5 years (2009-2014). A total of 143 early GP leavers participated in an online survey, of which 21 took part in recorded telephone interviews. Survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and qualitative data using thematic analysis techniques.

resultsReasons for leaving were cumulative and multifactorial. Organisational changes to the NHS have led to an increase in administrative tasks and overall workload that is perceived by GP participants to have fundamentally changed the doctor-patient relationship. Lack of time with patients has compromised the ability to practise more patient-centred care, and, with it, GPs' sense of professional autonomy and values, resulting in diminished job satisfaction. In this context, the additional pressures of increased patient demand and the negative media portrayal left many feeling unsupported and vulnerable to burnout and ill health, and, ultimately, to the decision to leave general practice.

conclusionTo improve retention of young GPs, the pace of administrative change needs to be minimised and the time spent by GPs on work that is not face-to-face patient care reduced.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelProfessional AutonomySurveys and QuestionnairesAdultEnglandFemaleGeneral PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedState Medicineburnoutgeneral practicejob satisfactionprofessional autonomyqualitative researchworkload

Identifiers

PMID26740606
PMCPMC4723211
OpenAlexW2229130073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.