Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26740580›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2016

Robust detection of alternative splicing in a population of single cells.

Joshua D Welch, Yin Hu, Jan F Prins

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Quantifying transcriptome diversity: a review.Briefings in functional genomics · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Single-Cell Analysis of the Transcriptome and Epigenome.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. F1000Research · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Alternative mRNA splicing in cancer immunotherapy.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joshua D WelchDepartment of Computer Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175, USA Curriculum in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7264, USA.
Yin HuComputational Oncology, Sage Bionetworks, 1100 Fairview Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
Jan F PrinsDepartment of Computer Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175, USA Curriculum in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7264, USA prins@cs.unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USSage Bionetworks · US

Funding

UNC Predoc Training Progr in Bioinformatics/Comp BiologyT32GM067553 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ELSTON, TIMOTHY C · 2005 to 2019
$2.5M
Unlocking transcript diversity via differential analyses of splice graphsR01HG006272 · NHGRI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LIU, JINZE, PRINS, JAN F · 2012 to 2014
$1.2M
Big Data to Knowledge Training ProgramT32CA201159 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FOREST, MARK GREGORY, KOSOROK, MICHAEL R · 2015 to 2015
$316k
Computational Modeling of Heterogeneous Gene Expression in Single CellsF31HG008912 · NHGRI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WELCH, JOSHUA · 2016 to 2017
$45k
NHGRI NIH HHS F31 HG008912NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006272NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM067553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single cell RNA-seq experiments provide valuable insight into cellular heterogeneity but suffer from low coverage, 3' bias and technical noise. These unique properties of single cell RNA-seq data make study of alternative splicing difficult, and thus most single cell studies have restricted analysis of transcriptome variation to the gene level. To address these limitations, we developed SingleSplice, which uses a statistical model to detect genes whose isoform usage shows biological variation significantly exceeding technical noise in a population of single cells. Importantly, SingleSplice is tailored to the unique demands of single cell analysis, detecting isoform usage differences without attempting to infer expression levels for full-length transcripts. Using data from spike-in transcripts, we found that our approach detects variation in isoform usage among single cells with high sensitivity and specificity. We also applied SingleSplice to data from mouse embryonic stem cells and discovered a set of genes that show significant biological variation in isoform usage across the set of cells. A subset of these isoform differences are linked to cell cycle stage, suggesting a novel connection between alternative splicing and the cell cycle.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingAnimalsBase SequenceCell CycleComputational BiologyEmbryonic Stem CellsGene Expression ProfilingMiceModels, StatisticalProtein IsoformsRNASequence Analysis, RNAProtein IsoformsRNA

Identifiers

PMID26740580
PMCPMC4856971
OpenAlexW2227231914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.