Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26740550›Full record

ArticleHuman molecular genetics2016

Assessing similarity to primary tissue and cortical layer identity in induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cortical neurons through single-cell transcriptomics.

Adam E Handel, Satyan Chintawar, Tatjana Lalic, Emma Whiteley, Jane Vowles, Alice Giustacchini, Karene Argoud, Paul Sopp, Mahito Nakanishi, Rory Bowden and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human molecular genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Reprogramming of neuronal genome function and phenotype by astrocytes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Tackling neurodegenerationFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Adam E HandelDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire OX1 3QX, UK, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire OX3 9DS, UK.
Satyan ChintawarWeatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire OX3 9DS, UK.
Tatjana LalicWeatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire OX3 9DS, UK.
Emma WhiteleyDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire OX1 3QT, UK.
Jane VowlesDunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire OX1 3RE, UK.
Alice GiustacchiniWeatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire OX3 9DS, UK.
Karene ArgoudWellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire OX3 7BN and.
Paul SoppWeatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire OX3 9DS, UK.
Mahito NakanishiResearch Center for Stem Cell Engineering, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Rory BowdenWellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire OX3 7BN and.
Sally CowleyDunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire OX1 3RE, UK.
Sarah NeweyDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire OX1 3QT, UK.
Colin AkermanDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire OX1 3QT, UK.
Chris P PontingDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire OX1 3QX, UK.
M Zameel CaderWeatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire OX3 9DS, UK, zameel.cader@ndcn.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_14131Medical Research Council MC_U137761446Medical Research Council MC_UU_12021/1Medical Research Council MR/M00919X/1Medical Research Council MR/M024962/1Parkinson's UK J-0901Wellcome Trust 090532/Z/09/ZWellcome Trust 100643/Z/12/ZWellcome Trust WTISSF121302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived cortical neurons potentially present a powerful new model to understand corticogenesis and neurological disease. Previous work has established that differentiation protocols can produce cortical neurons, but little has been done to characterize these at cellular resolution. In particular, it is unclear to what extent in vitro two-dimensional, relatively disordered culture conditions recapitulate the development of in vivo cortical layer identity. Single-cell multiplex reverse transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was used to interrogate the expression of genes previously implicated in cortical layer or phenotypic identity in individual cells. Totally, 93.6% of single cells derived from iPSCs expressed genes indicative of neuronal identity. High proportions of single neurons derived from iPSCs expressed glutamatergic receptors and synaptic genes. And, 68.4% of iPSC-derived neurons expressing at least one layer marker could be assigned to a laminar identity using canonical cortical layer marker genes. We compared single-cell RNA-seq of our iPSC-derived neurons to available single-cell RNA-seq data from human fetal and adult brain and found that iPSC-derived cortical neurons closely resembled primary fetal brain cells. Unexpectedly, a subpopulation of iPSC-derived neurons co-expressed canonical fetal deep and upper cortical layer markers. However, this appeared to be concordant with data from primary cells. Our results therefore provide reassurance that iPSC-derived cortical neurons are highly similar to primary cortical neurons at the level of single cells but suggest that current layer markers, although effective, may not be able to disambiguate cortical layer identity in all cells.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeAdultAgedBiomarkersCell DifferentiationCell LineCerebral CortexFemaleFetusFibroblastsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsNerve Tissue ProteinsNeurogenesisBiomarkersNerve Tissue ProteinsReceptors, Glutamate

Identifiers

PMID26740550
PMCPMC4754051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.