ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2016
SV-Bay: structural variant detection in cancer genomes using a Bayesian approach with correction for GC-content and read mappability.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transposable Element Insertions Are Associated with Batesian Mimicry in the Pantropical Butterfly Hypolimnas misippus.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- What makes TMB an ambivalent biomarker for immunotherapy? A subtle mismatch between the sample-based design of variant callers and real clinical cohort.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Article
- Copy Number Variation Detection by Single-Cell DNA Sequencing with SCOPE.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Identification of Copy Number Alterations from Next-Generation Sequencing Data.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022Article
- PopDel identifies medium-size deletions simultaneously in tens of thousands of genomes.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Discovery of tandem and interspersed segmental duplications using high-throughput sequencing.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- Comprehensive evaluation and characterisation of short read general-purpose structural variant calling software.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Noise cancellation using total variation for copy number variation detection.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Identifying structural variants using linked-read sequencing data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- Reconstructing cancer karyotypes from short read data: the half empty and half full glass.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Detecting large deletions at base pair level by combining split read and paired read data.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Preprocessing Sequence Coverage Data for More Precise Detection of Copy Number Variations.IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformaticsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationWhole genome sequencing of paired-end reads can be applied to characterize the landscape of large somatic rearrangements of cancer genomes. Several methods for detecting structural variants with whole genome sequencing data have been developed. So far, none of these methods has combined information about abnormally mapped read pairs connecting rearranged regions and associated global copy number changes automatically inferred from the same sequencing data file. Our aim was to create a computational method that could use both types of information, i.e. normal and abnormal reads, and demonstrate that by doing so we can highly improve both sensitivity and specificity rates of structural variant prediction.
resultsWe developed a computational method, SV-Bay, to detect structural variants from whole genome sequencing mate-pair or paired-end data using a probabilistic Bayesian approach. This approach takes into account depth of coverage by normal reads and abnormalities in read pair mappings. To estimate the model likelihood, SV-Bay considers GC-content and read mappability of the genome, thus making important corrections to the expected read count. For the detection of somatic variants, SV-Bay makes use of a matched normal sample when it is available. We validated SV-Bay on simulated datasets and an experimental mate-pair dataset for the CLB-GA neuroblastoma cell line. The comparison of SV-Bay with several other methods for structural variant detection demonstrated that SV-Bay has better prediction accuracy both in terms of sensitivity and false-positive detection rate. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/InstitutCurie/SV-Bay CONTACT: valentina.boeva@inserm.fr SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.