ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2016
A proteogenomic approach to understand splice isoform functions through sequence and expression-based computational modeling.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the functional impact of alternative splicing on human protein isoforms using available annotation sources.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2019Review
- DIFFUSE: predicting isoform functions from sequences and expression profiles via deep learning.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- Progress on the HUPO Draft Human Proteome: 2017 Metrics of the Human Proteome Project.Journal of proteome research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The products of multi-exon genes are a mixture of alternatively spliced isoforms, from which the translated proteins can have similar, different or even opposing functions. It is therefore essential to differentiate and annotate functions for individual isoforms. Computational approaches provide an efficient complement to expensive and time-consuming experimental studies. The input data of these methods range from DNA sequence, to RNA selection pressure, to expressed sequence tags, to full-length complementary DNA, to exon array, to RNA-seq expression, to proteomic data. Notably, RNA-seq technology generates quantitative profiling of transcript expression at the genome scale, with an unprecedented amount of expression data available for developing isoform function prediction methods. Integrative analysis of these data at different molecular levels enables a proteogenomic approach to systematically interrogate isoform functions. Here, we briefly review the state-of-the-art methods according to their input data sources, discuss their advantages and limitations and point out potential ways to improve prediction accuracies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.