Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26740288›Full record

ReviewJournal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS2016

The BREAST-Q in surgical research: A review of the literature 2009-2015.

Wess A Cohen, Lily R Mundy, Tiffany N S Ballard, Anne Klassen, Stefan J Cano, John Browne, Andrea L Pusic

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03777852 (Emotional Evaluation and Reconstructed Breast Satisfaction After Breast Cancer Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 138 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
138citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03777852 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Emotional Evaluation and Reconstructed Breast Satisfaction After Breast Cancer Treatment: Breast Q Questionary

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Sao PauloRan2019 to 2022Enrolled110ConditionsMalignant Neoplasm of the BreastArmsFirst Questionnaire application, Second Questionnaire application
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

138 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery for women with primary breast cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures after rhinoplasty.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. The delayed mouth-opening technique: a staged inset strategy to prevent distal necrosis in perioral free flap reconstruction.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

78 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wess A CohenDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA. Electronic address: wesscohen@gmail.com.
Lily R MundyCollege of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York City, NY, USA.
Tiffany N S BallardSection of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Anne KlassenMcMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Stefan J CanoModus Outcomes, Stotfold, UK.
John BrowneDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College Cork, Western Gateway Building, Western Road, Cork, Ireland.
Andrea L PusicDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth outcomes research has gained considerable traction over the past decade as the medical community attempts to move beyond traditional outcome measures such as morbidity and mortality. Since its inception in 2009, the BREAST-Q has provided meaningful and reliable information regarding health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and patient satisfaction for use in both clinical practice and research. In this study, we review how researchers have used the BREAST-Q and how it has enhanced our understanding and practice of plastic and reconstructive breast surgery.

methodsAn electronic literature review was performed to identify publications that used the BREAST-Q to assess patient outcomes. Studies developing and/or validating the BREAST-Q or an alternate patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), review papers, conference abstracts, discussions, comments and/or responses to previously published papers, studies that modified a version of BREAST-Q, and studies not published in English were excluded.

resultsOur literature review yielded 214 unique articles, 49 of which met our inclusion criteria. Important trends and highlights were further examined. DISCUSSION: The BREAST-Q has provided important insights into breast surgery highlighted by literature concerning autologous reconstruction, implant type, fat grafting, and patient education. The BREAST-Q has increased the use of PROMs in breast surgery and provided numerous important insights in its brief existence. The increased interest in PROMs as well as the underutilized potential of the BREAST-Q should permit its continued use and ability to foster innovations and improve quality of care.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchHealth StatusQuality of LifeBreastFemaleHumansMammaplastyPatient SatisfactionBREAST-QBreast surgeryPatient reported outcome measuresPatient reported outcomesPROMS

Identifiers

PMID26740288
PMCPMC4995882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.