Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26739740›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2016

Endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair for inguinal disruption (Sportsman's hernia): rationale and design of a prospective observational cohort study (TEP-ID-study).

C E H Voorbrood, E Goedhart, E J M M Verleisdonk, F Sanders, D Naafs, J P J Burgmans

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C E H VoorbroodDepartment of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht/Zeist, Zeist, The Netherlands.
E GoedhartKNVB/FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence (Sport Medical Centre of the Royal Netherlands Football Association/FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence), Zeist, The Netherlands.
E J M M VerleisdonkDepartment of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht/Zeist, Zeist, The Netherlands.
F SandersDepartment of Radiology, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht/Zeist, Zeist, The Netherlands.
D NaafsDepartment of Radiology, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht/Zeist, Zeist, The Netherlands.
J P J BurgmansDepartment of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht/Zeist, Zeist, The Netherlands.
Diakonessenhuis hospital · NLRoyal Dutch Football Association · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChronic inguinal pain is a frequently occurring problem in athletes. A diagnosis of inguinal disruption is performed by exclusion of other conditions causing groin pain. Up to now, conservative medical management is considered to be the primary treatment for this condition. Relevant large and prospective clinical studies regarding the treatment of inguinal disruption are limited; however, recent studies have shown the benefits of the totally extraperitoneal patch (TEP) technique.This study provides a complete assessment of the inguinal area in athletes with chronic inguinal pain before and after treatment with the TEP hernia repair technique. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We describe the rationale and design of an observational cohort study for surgical treatment with the endoscopic TEP hernia repair technique in athletes with a painful groin (inguinal disruption).The study is being conducted in a high-volume, single centre hospital with specialty in TEP hernia repair. Patients over 18 years, suffering from inguinal pain for at least 3 months during or after playing sports, and whom have not undergone previous inguinal surgery and have received no benefit from physiotherapy are eligible for inclusion. Patients with any another cause of inguinal pain, proven by physical examination, inguinal ultrasound, X-pelvis/hip or MRI are excluded.Primary outcome is reduction in pain after 3 months. Secondary outcomes are pain reduction, physical functioning, and resumption of sport (in frequency and intensity). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: An unrestricted research grant for general study purposes was assigned to the Hernia Centre. This study itself is not directly subject to the above mentioned research grant or any other financial sponsorship. We intend to publish the outcome of the study, regardless of the findings. All authors will give final approval of the manuscript version to be published.

Indexed as

Athletic InjuriesChronic PainEndoscopyHernia, InguinalHerniorrhaphyHumansProspective StudiesQuality of LifeReturn to SportSurgical MeshTreatment Outcomeinguinal disruptioninguinal painsportsman’s herniatotally extraperitoneal patch (TEP) technique

Identifiers

PMID26739740
PMCPMC4716196
OpenAlexW2222378412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.