Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26739737›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2016

Preovulatory uterine flushing with saline as a treatment for unexplained infertility: a randomised controlled trial protocol.

Sarah Maheux-Lacroix, Sylvie Dodin, Lynne Moore, Emmanuel Bujold, Jessica Lefebvre, Marie-Ève Bergeron

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02539290 (Preovulatory Uterine Flushing With Saline as a Treatment for Unexplained Infertility), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02539290 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Preovulatory Uterine Flushing With Saline as a Treatment for Unexplained Infertility: A Randomised Controlled Trial Protocol

TypeinterventionalSponsorCHU de Quebec-Universite LavalRan2015 to 2025Enrolled192ConditionsUnexplained Infertility, InfertilityArmsDetection of ovulation, Uterine flushing, Vaginal flushing, Sexual intercourse
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah Maheux-LacroixDépartement d'obstétrique, gynécologie et reproduction, Université Laval, Québec, Canada Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, Québec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4187-3708
Sylvie DodinDépartement d'obstétrique, gynécologie et reproduction, Université Laval, Québec, Canada Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, Québec, Canada.
Lynne MooreCentre de recherche du CHU de Québec, Québec, Canada.
Emmanuel BujoldDépartement d'obstétrique, gynécologie et reproduction, Université Laval, Québec, Canada Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, Québec, Canada.
Jessica LefebvreDépartement d'obstétrique, gynécologie et reproduction, Université Laval, Québec, Canada Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, Québec, Canada.
Marie-Ève BergeronDépartement d'obstétrique, gynécologie et reproduction, Université Laval, Québec, Canada Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, Québec, Canada.
Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn vitro fertilisation (IVF) is the treatment of choice for unexplained infertility. Preovulatory uterine flushing could reduce intrauterine debris and inflammatory factors preventing pregnancy and constitute an alternative to IVF. Our objective is to assess the efficacy of preovulatory uterine flushing with physiological saline for the treatment of unexplained infertility. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will perform a randomised controlled trial based on consecutive women aged between 18 and 37 years consulting for unexplained infertility for at least 1 year. On the day of their luteinising hormone surge, 192 participants will be randomised in two equal groups to either receive 20 mL of physiological saline by an intrauterine catheter or 10 mL of saline intravaginally. We will assess relative risk of live birth (primary outcome), as well as pregnancy (secondary outcome) over one cycle of treatment. We will report the side effects, complications and acceptability of the intervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This project was approved by the Ethics committee of the Centre Hospitatlier Universitaire de Quebec (no 2015-1146). Uterine flushing is usually well tolerated by women and would constitute a simple, affordable and minimally invasive treatment for unexplained infertility. We plan to communicate the results of the review by presenting research abstracts at conferences and by publishing the results in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02539290; Pre-results.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFemaleHumansInfertilityLive BirthOvulationPregnancyQuebecSingle-Blind MethodSodium ChlorideTherapeutic IrrigationUterusVaginaYoung AdultSodium ChlorideTubal flushingUnexplained infertilityUterine flushing

Identifiers

PMID26739737
PMCPMC4716241
OpenAlexW2226244872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.