SynthesisBMJ open2016
Prognostic factors for disability and sick leave in patients with subacute non-malignant pain: a systematic review of cohort studies.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk factors for the progression of finger interphalangeal joint osteoarthritis: a systematic review.Rheumatology international · 2020Pooled it
- Prognostic Factors for Physical Functioning After Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation in Patients With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The Clinical journal of pain · 2019Pooled it
- Generic prognostic factors for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2017Pooled it
- Modifiable prognostic factors of high societal costs among people on sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders: a replication study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Trial
- Two-Year Follow-Up on Return to Work in a Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Brief and Multidisciplinary Intervention in Employees on Sick Leave Due to Low Back Pain.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2022Trial
- Trial
- The impact of anxiety/depression symptoms on return to work in patients with chronic neck or back pain: a longitudinal cohort study from the Norwegian neck and back registry.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Mapping the Landscape of Work Rehabilitation Education in Physiotherapy Programs: Findings from a Cross-Sectional Survey in Quebec.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Is the association between graded sickness absence and return to work confounded by health? A longitudinal cohort study from the Norwegian neck and back registry.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Systemic Inflammation, Sleep, and Psychological Factors Determine Recovery Trajectories for People With Neck Pain: An Exploratory Study.The journal of pain · 2024Article
- Associations between pain intensity, psychosocial factors, and pain-related disability in 4285 patients with chronic pain.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Decision Support for Managing Common Musculoskeletal Pain Disorders: Development of a Case-Based Reasoning Application.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Article
- Vocational Rehabilitation and Length of Stay at Work after Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Longitudinal Study in Brazil.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Factors associated with limitations in daily life and at work in a population with shoulder pain.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
- Beliefs about back pain and associations with clinical outcomes: a primary care cohort study.BMJ open · 2022Observational
- Can the French version of the short Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire or its subsets predict the evolution of patients with acute, (sub) acute and chronic pain?BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
- The Association between Bodily Pain and Cognitive Impairment in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis systematic review aims to identify generic prognostic factors for disability and sick leave in subacute pain patients.
settingGeneral practice and other primary care facilities.
participantsAdults (>18 years) with a subacute (≤ 3-month) non-malignant pain condition. Eligibility criteria were cohort studies investigating the prediction of disability or long-term sick leave in adults with a subacute pain condition in a primary care setting. 19 studies were included, referring to a total of 6266 patients suffering from pain in the head, neck, back and shoulders. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was long-term disability (>3 months) due to a pain condition. The secondary outcome was sick leave, defined as 'absence from work' or 'return-to-work'.
resultsPubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and PEDro databases were searched from 16 January 2003 to 16 January 2014. The quality of evidence was presented according to the GRADE WG recommendations. Several factors were found to be associated with disability at follow-up for at least two different pain symptoms. However, owing to insufficient studies, no generic risk factors for sick leave were identified.
conclusionsMultiple site pain, high pain severity, older age, baseline disability and longer pain duration were identified as potential prognostic factors for disability across pain sites. There was limited evidence that anxiety and depression were associated with disability in patients with subacute pain, indicating that these factors may not play as large a role as expected in developing disability due to a pain condition. Quality of evidence was moderate, low or very low, implying that confidence in the results is limited. Large prospective prognostic factor studies are needed with sufficient study populations and transparent reporting of all factors examined. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42014008914.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.