Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26739645›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2016

Genetic Correlates of Individual Differences in Sleep Behavior of Free-Living Great Tits (Parus major).

Erica F Stuber, Christine Baumgartner, Niels J Dingemanse, Bart Kempenaers, Jakob C Mueller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
13.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Of Men and Mice: Modeling the Fragile X Syndrome.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  6. Sleep research goes wild: new methods and approaches to investigate the ecology, evolution and functions of sleep.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  7. Two sides of a coin: ecological and chronobiological perspectives of timing in the wild.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erica F StuberDepartment of Behavioural Ecology and Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany efstuber@gmail.com.
Christine BaumgartnerDepartment of Behavioural Ecology and Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany.
Niels J DingemanseEvolutionary Ecology of Variation Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, 82319 Seewiesen, Germany Department of Biology II, Behavioural Ecology, Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, 82152 Germany.
Bart KempenaersDepartment of Behavioural Ecology and Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany.
Jakob C MuellerDepartment of Behavioural Ecology and Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany.
Max Planck Institute for Ornithology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within populations, free-living birds display considerable variation in observable sleep behaviors, reflecting dynamic interactions between individuals and their environment. Genes are expected to contribute to repeatable between-individual differences in sleep behaviors, which may be associated with individual fitness. We identified and genotyped polymorphisms in nine candidate genes for sleep, and measured five repeatable sleep behaviors in free-living great tits (Parus major), partly replicating a previous study in blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus). Microsatellites in the CLOCK and NPAS2 clock genes exhibited an association with sleep duration relative to night length, and morning latency to exit the nest box, respectively. Furthermore, microsatellites in the NPSR1 and PCSK2 genes associated with relative sleep duration and proportion of time spent awake at night, respectively. Given the detection rate of associations in the same models run with random markers instead of candidate genes, we expected two associations to arise by chance. The detection of four associations between candidate genes and sleep, however, suggests that clock genes, a clock-related gene, or a gene involved in the melanocortin system, could play key roles in maintaining phenotypic variation in sleep behavior in avian populations. Knowledge of the genetic architecture underlying sleep behavior in the wild is important because it will enable ecologists to assess the evolution of sleep in response to selection.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalGenetic Association StudiesAllelesAnimalsCircadian RhythmGene FrequencyGenetics, PopulationGenotypeMicrosatellite RepeatsPasseriformesPhenotypePolymorphism, GeneticSleepcandidate genecircadian rhythmgenotype-phenotype associationrepeatabilitysleep

Identifiers

PMID26739645
PMCPMC4777123
OpenAlexW2262234179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.