ReviewToxicology and applied pharmacology2016
Current understanding of interactions between nanoparticles and the immune system.
Review in Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 127 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
127 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Harnessing plant growth-promoting bacteria for nanoparticle biosynthesis: a systematic review of mechanisms, agricultural applications, and biomedical potential.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2026Pooled it
- Cancer therapy with iron oxide nanoparticles: Agents of thermal and immune therapies.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Nanomaterials for the Prevention, Detection, and Treatment of Pharyngeal Human Papillomavirus Infection: A Translational Roadmap.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Biomaterial-Driven Modulation of Macrophage Polarization in an Experimental Environment of Implant-Associated Infection Mediated byJournal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Immunomodulatory Empty/Hollow Nanoparticles as Potential Therapeutic Strategies for Septic Shock.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Emerging paradigms in nanostructured targeted drug delivery systems.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Nanotechnology-mediated strategies for skeletal muscle repair and regeneration: targeted intervention, functional remodeling, and translational challenges.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Implementing QbD for Nano-Pharmaceuticals and Complex Formulations to Achieve Predictable and High-Quality Outcomes.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2026Review
- Novel Liposomal Adjuvants Enhance the Immune Response to RecombinantVeterinary medicine international · 2026Article
- Mannosylated nanocarriers: a precision targeting strategy for tumors and infectious diseases.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Extracellular Vesicle-Associated Non-Coding RNAs in Preeclampsia: Mechanistic Insights, Biomarker Discovery, and Emerging Nanomedicine Concepts.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Concerns and challenges in clinics-guided nanovaccines design and applications.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
- Chitosan-Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Therapeutic Potential of Photoimmunotherapy as a Safe, Effective and Non-Toxic Treatment Option for Superficial Triple Negative Breast Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Immunomodulatory Effects of Gold Nanoparticles: Impacts on Immune Cells and Mechanisms of Action.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Supramolecular Polymer Bottlebrushes: In Situ Assessment of Noncovalent Assemblies in Human Serum by Analytical Ultracentrifugation.Macromolecular rapid communications · 2025Article
- Imaging-guided precision hyperthermia with magnetic nanoparticles.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2025Article
- Applications of liposomes and lipid nanoparticles in cancer therapy: current advances and prospects.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2025Review
67 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The delivery of drugs, antigens, and imaging agents benefits from using nanotechnology-based carriers. The successful translation of nanoformulations to the clinic involves thorough assessment of their safety profiles, which, among other end-points, includes evaluation of immunotoxicity. The past decade of research focusing on nanoparticle interaction with the immune system has been fruitful in terms of understanding the basics of nanoparticle immunocompatibility, developing a bioanalytical infrastructure to screen for nanoparticle-mediated immune reactions, beginning to uncover the mechanisms of nanoparticle immunotoxicity, and utilizing current knowledge about the structure-activity relationship between nanoparticles' physicochemical properties and their effects on the immune system to guide safe drug delivery. In the present review, we focus on the most prominent pieces of the nanoparticle-immune system puzzle and discuss the achievements, disappointments, and lessons learned over the past 15years of research on the immunotoxicity of engineered nanomaterials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.