ArticleAllergy, asthma & immunology research2016
Defining Chronic Cough: A Systematic Review of the Epidemiological Literature.
Article in Allergy, asthma & immunology research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05042063 (Acoustic Cough Monitoring for the Management of Patients With Known Respiratory Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Acoustic Cough Monitoring for the Management of Patients With Known Respiratory Disease
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of chronic cough in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Performance of fractional exhaled nitric oxide in predicting response to inhaled corticosteroids in chronic cough: a meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Prevalence, aetiologies and prognosis of the symptom cough in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC family practice · 2021Pooled it
- Pregabalin for chronic cough due to lung cancer: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.British journal of cancer · 2025Trial
- The Genetic Architecture of Chronic Cough: From Sensory Hypersensitivity to Treatable Trait.Pulmonary therapy · 2026Review
- Association between heavy metal exposure and chronic cough: the mediating roles of inflammation.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Prevalence and burden of chronic cough in China: results from a population-based survey.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- How Will a Treatable Traits Approach Reshape Clinical Practice in Chronic Cough?Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2025Review
- Review
- Neuromodulators in Acute and Chronic Cough in Children: An Update from the Literature.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Article
- Vaping habits and respiratory symptoms using a smartphone app platform.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Prevalence, clinical characteristics, and disease burden of chronic cough in Italy: a cross-sectional study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Article
- Epidemiology and Healthcare Service Utilization among Adults with Chronic Cough.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Prevalence and burden of chronic cough in France.ERJ open research · 2024Article
- Chronic Cough: Characterizing and Quantifying Burden in Adults Using a Nationwide Electronic Health Records Database.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2024Article
- Prevalence of chronic cough, its risk factors and population attributable risk in the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease (BOLD) study: a multinational cross-sectional study.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- Development of a Comprehensive Cough Therapy Program (CCTP) for chronic cough in India: a qualitative study.CoDAS · 2024Article
- Worldwide prevalence, risk factors and burden of chronic cough in the general population: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRecent evidence suggests a global burden of chronic cough in general populations. However, the definitions vary greatly among epidemiological studies, and none have been validated for clinical relevance. We aimed to examine previous epidemiological definitions in detail and explore the operational characteristics.
methodsA systematic review was conducted for epidemiological surveys that reported the prevalence of chronic cough in general adult populations during the years 1980 to 2013. A literature search was performed on Pubmed and Embase without language restriction. Epidemiological definitions for chronic cough were classified according to their components, such as cutoff duration. Meta-analyses were performed for the male-to-female ratio of chronic cough prevalence to explore operational characteristics of epidemiological definitions.
resultsA total of 70 studies were included in the systematic review. The most common epidemiological definition was identified as 'cough ≥3 months' duration without specification of phlegm (n=50); however, it conflicted with the cutoff duration in current clinical guidelines (cough ≥8 weeks). Meta-analyses were performed for the male-to-female ratio of chronic cough among 28 studies that reported sex-specific prevalence using the most common definition. The pooled male-to-female odds ratio was 1.26 (95% confidence interval 0.92-1.73) with significant heterogeneity (I²=96%, P<0.001), which was in contrast to clinical observations of female predominance from specialist clinics. Subgroup analyses did not reverse the ratio or reduce the heterogeneity.
conclusionsThis study identified major issues in defining chronic cough in future epidemiological studies. The conflict between epidemiological and clinical diagnostic criteria needs to be resolved. The unexpected difference in the gender predominance between the community and clinics warrants further studies. Clinical validation of the existing definition is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.