ArticleSystematic reviews2016
Evidence map of studies evaluating methods for conducting, interpreting and reporting overviews of systematic reviews of interventions: rationale and design.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The effectiveness of interventions to reduce adverse outcomes among older adults following Emergency Department discharge: umbrella review.BMC geriatrics · 2022Pooled it
- Methodological approaches for assessing certainty of the evidence in umbrella reviews: A scoping review.PloS one · 2022Pooled it
- Pornography use and sexting amongst children and young people: a systematic overview of reviews.Systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Methodological and reporting quality evaluation of meta-analyses on the Chinese herbal preparation Zheng Qing Feng Tong Ning for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2020Pooled it
- Silver diamine fluoride for managing carious lesions: an umbrella review.BMC oral health · 2019Pooled it
- Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 1-purpose, eligibility, search and data extraction.Systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Clinical-effectiveness of self-management interventions in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: An overview of reviews.Chronic respiratory disease · 2017Pooled it
- Impact of Information and Communication Technologies on Nursing Care: Results of an Overview of Systematic Reviews.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017Pooled it
- Liposomal bupivacaine in thoracic surgery: a comprehensive review of current evidence and clinical implications.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- The role of pulmonary rehabilitation in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: An overview of systematic reviews.PloS one · 2023Review
- A new taxonomy was developed for overlap across 'overviews of systematic reviews': A meta-research study of research waste.Research synthesis methods · 2022Article
- Breathing Exercises in the Treatment of COPD: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2022Review
- Managing overlap of primary study results across systematic reviews: practical considerations for authors of overviews of reviews.BMC medical research methodology · 2021Article
- Safety and efficacy of stem cell therapy: an overview protocol on published meta-analyses and evidence mapping.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Over half of clinical practice guidelines use non-systematic methods to inform recommendations: A methods study.PloS one · 2021Article
- Article
- Effectiveness of interventions to reduce adverse outcomes among older adults following emergency department discharge: Protocol for an overview of systematic reviews.HRB open research · 2020Article
- The perspectives of patients and their caregivers on self-management interventions for chronic conditions: a protocol for a mixed-methods overview.F1000Research · 2020Article
- Effectiveness and Safety of Herbal Medicine for Atopic Dermatitis: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2020Review
- Effectiveness of non-pharmacological falls prevention interventions for people with Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's Disease and stroke: protocol for an umbrella review.HRB open research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOverviews of systematic reviews attempt to systematically retrieve and summarise the results of multiple systematic reviews into a single document. Methods for conducting, interpreting and reporting overviews of reviews are in their infancy. To date, there has been no systematic review or evidence map examining the range of methods for overviews nor of the evidence for using these methods. The objectives of the study are to develop and populate a framework of methods that have or may be used in conducting, interpreting and reporting overviews of systematic reviews of interventions (stage I); create an evidence map of studies that have evaluated these methods (stage II); and identify and describe unique methodological challenges of overviews.
methodsThe research will be undertaken in two stages. For both stages, we plan to search methods collections (e.g. Cochrane Methodology Register, Meth4ReSyn library, AHRQ Effective Health Care Program) to identify eligible studies. These searches will be supplemented by searching reference lists and citation searching. Stage I: Methods used in overviews will be identified from articles describing methods for overviews, methods studies examining a cross section/cohort of overviews, guidance documents and commentaries. The identified methods will populate a framework of available methods for conducting an overview. Two reviewers will independently code included studies to develop the framework. Thematic analysis of the coded data will be used to categorise and describe methods. Stage II: Evaluations of the performance of methods will be identified from systematic reviews of methods studies and methods studies. Evaluations will be described and mapped to the framework of methods identified in stage I. DISCUSSION: The results of this process will be useful for mapping of methods for overviews of systematic reviews, informing guidance and identifying and prioritising method research in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.