ArticleExperimental dermatology2016
Longitudinal in vivo tracking of adverse effects following topical steroid treatment.
Article in Experimental dermatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tetrahedral framework nucleic acids: Nanokeys unlocking a new era of precision biomedicine.Journal of advanced research · 2026Review
- Label-Free Multimodal Multiphoton Intravital Imaging.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021Article
- Multiple subcutaneous haematomas of the legs causing skin necrosis in an elderly patient affected by corticosteroid-induced skin atrophy: Case report and review of literature.International wound journal · 2020Review
- Video-rate multimodal multiphoton imaging and three-dimensional characterization of cellular dynamics in wounded skin.Journal of innovative optical health sciences · 2020Article
- Glucocorticoid-Induced Skin Atrophy: The Old and the New.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2020Review
- High-speed imaging of transient metabolic dynamics using two-photon fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy.Optica · 2018Article
- In Vivo Assessment of Engineered Skin Cell Delivery with Multimodal Optical Microscopy.Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods · 2017Article
- A quantitative framework for the analysis of multimodal optical microscopy images.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Topical steroids are known for their anti-inflammatory properties and are commonly prescribed to treat many adverse skin conditions such as eczema and psoriasis. While these treatments are known to be effective, adverse effects including skin atrophy are common. In this study, the progression of these effects is investigated in an in vivo mouse model using multimodal optical microscopy. Utilizing a system capable of performing two-photon excitation fluorescence microscopy (TPEF) of reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) to visualize the epidermal cell layers and second harmonic generation (SHG) microscopy to identify collagen in the dermis, these processes can be studied at the cellular level. Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) is also utilized to image intracellular NADH levels to obtain molecular information regarding metabolic activity following steroid treatment. In this study, fluticasone propionate (FP)-treated, mometasone furoate (MF)-treated and untreated animals were imaged longitudinally using a custom-built multimodal optical microscope. Prolonged steroid treatment over the course of 21 days is shown to result in a significant increase in mean fluorescence lifetime of NADH, suggesting a faster rate of maturation of epidermal keratinocytes. Alterations to collagen organization and the structural microenvironment are also observed. These results give insight into the structural and biochemical processes of skin atrophy associated with prolonged steroid treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.