ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2016
Comparison of Performance Characteristics of Aspergillus PCR in Testing a Range of Blood-Based Samples in Accordance with International Methodological Recommendations.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05860387 (Early Diagnosis of Invasive Lung Aspergillosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Early Diagnosis of Invasive Lung Aspergillosis
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-invasive diagnosis of invasive fungal disease with cell-free DNA PCR.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026Review
- Evaluation of the Prognostic Value of PCR Cycle Threshold and Mortality in Pulmonary Aspergillosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- HTS and PCR Methods Are the Most Used in the Diagnosis of Aspergillosis: Advantages over Other Molecular Methods.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Molecular Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Diseases with a Focus on PCR.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Current and Future Pathways inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Recognition of Diagnostic Gaps for Laboratory Diagnosis of Fungal Diseases: Expert Opinion from the Fungal Diagnostics Laboratories Consortium (FDLC).Journal of clinical microbiology · 2021Article
- Blood Aspergillus PCR: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Molecular Diagnostic Advances in Transplant Infectious Diseases.Current infectious disease reports · 2019Review
- Article
- Non-culture based assays for the detection of fungal pathogens.Journal de mycologie medicale · 2018Review
- Challenges and Solution of Invasive Aspergillosis in Non-neutropenic Patients: A Review.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2018Review
- Molecular Diagnosis of Invasive Aspergillosis and Detection of Azole Resistance by a Newly Commercialized PCR Kit.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2017Article
- A Review of Diagnostic Methods for Invasive Fungal Diseases: Challenges and Perspectives.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2017Review
- Molecular Diagnostic Testing for Aspergillus.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2016Review
- PCR Technology for Detection of Invasive Aspergillosis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Review
- An update on current and novel molecular diagnostics for the diagnosis of invasive fungal infections.Expert review of molecular diagnosticsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Standardized methodologies for the molecular detection of invasive aspergillosis (IA) have been established by the European Aspergillus PCR Initiative for the testing of whole blood, serum, and plasma. While some comparison of the performance of Aspergillus PCR when testing these different sample types has been performed, no single study has evaluated all three using the recommended protocols. Standardized Aspergillus PCR was performed on 423 whole-blood pellets (WBP), 583 plasma samples, and 419 serum samples obtained from hematology patients according to the recommendations. This analysis formed a bicenter retrospective anonymous case-control study, with diagnosis according to the revised European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) consensus definitions (11 probable cases and 36 controls). Values for clinical performance using individual and combined samples were calculated. For all samples, PCR positivity was significantly associated with cases of IA (for plasma, P = 0.0019; for serum, P = 0.0049; and for WBP, P = 0.0089). Plasma PCR generated the highest sensitivity (91%); the sensitivities for serum and WBP PCR were 80% and 55%, respectively. The highest specificity was achieved when testing WBP (96%), which was significantly superior to the specificities achieved when testing serum (69%, P = 0.0238) and plasma (53%, P = 0.0002). No cases were PCR negative in all specimen types, and no controls were PCR positive in all specimens. This study confirms that Aspergillus PCR testing of plasma provides robust performance while utilizing commercial automated DNA extraction processes. Combining PCR testing of different blood fractions allows IA to be both confidently diagnosed and excluded. A requirement for multiple PCR-positive plasma samples provides similar diagnostic utility and is technically less demanding. Time to diagnosis may be enhanced by testing multiple contemporaneously obtained sample types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.