Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26739157›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2016

Comparison of Performance Characteristics of Aspergillus PCR in Testing a Range of Blood-Based Samples in Accordance with International Methodological Recommendations.

Jan Springer, P Lewis White, Shanna Hamilton, Denise Michel, Rosemary A Barnes, Hermann Einsele, Juergen Löffler

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05860387 (Early Diagnosis of Invasive Lung Aspergillosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05860387 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Early Diagnosis of Invasive Lung Aspergillosis

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital OstravaRan2023 to 2026Enrolled150ConditionsRespiratory Infection, Invasive Pulmonary AspergillosisArmsNext generation improvement of early invasive aspergillosis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Current and Future Pathways inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Blood Aspergillus PCR: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Molecular Diagnostic Testing for Aspergillus.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2016
    Review
  15. PCR Technology for Detection of Invasive Aspergillosis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jan SpringerUniversity of Würzburg Medical Centre, Würzburg, Germany.
P Lewis WhitePublic Health Wales Microbiology Cardiff, UHW, Cardiff, United Kingdom lewis.white@wales.nhs.uk.
Shanna HamiltonInfection and Immunity, Cardiff University, UHW, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Denise MichelUniversity of Würzburg Medical Centre, Würzburg, Germany.
Rosemary A BarnesInfection and Immunity, Cardiff University, UHW, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Hermann EinseleUniversity of Würzburg Medical Centre, Würzburg, Germany.
Juergen LöfflerUniversity of Würzburg Medical Centre, Würzburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standardized methodologies for the molecular detection of invasive aspergillosis (IA) have been established by the European Aspergillus PCR Initiative for the testing of whole blood, serum, and plasma. While some comparison of the performance of Aspergillus PCR when testing these different sample types has been performed, no single study has evaluated all three using the recommended protocols. Standardized Aspergillus PCR was performed on 423 whole-blood pellets (WBP), 583 plasma samples, and 419 serum samples obtained from hematology patients according to the recommendations. This analysis formed a bicenter retrospective anonymous case-control study, with diagnosis according to the revised European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) consensus definitions (11 probable cases and 36 controls). Values for clinical performance using individual and combined samples were calculated. For all samples, PCR positivity was significantly associated with cases of IA (for plasma, P = 0.0019; for serum, P = 0.0049; and for WBP, P = 0.0089). Plasma PCR generated the highest sensitivity (91%); the sensitivities for serum and WBP PCR were 80% and 55%, respectively. The highest specificity was achieved when testing WBP (96%), which was significantly superior to the specificities achieved when testing serum (69%, P = 0.0238) and plasma (53%, P = 0.0002). No cases were PCR negative in all specimen types, and no controls were PCR positive in all specimens. This study confirms that Aspergillus PCR testing of plasma provides robust performance while utilizing commercial automated DNA extraction processes. Combining PCR testing of different blood fractions allows IA to be both confidently diagnosed and excluded. A requirement for multiple PCR-positive plasma samples provides similar diagnostic utility and is technically less demanding. Time to diagnosis may be enhanced by testing multiple contemporaneously obtained sample types.

Indexed as

Polymerase Chain ReactionAdultAgedAspergillosisAspergillusCase-Control StudiesFemaleFungemiaHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26739157
PMCPMC4767955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.