Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26739115›Full record

ArticleNature communications2016

Label-free cell cycle analysis for high-throughput imaging flow cytometry.

Thomas Blasi, Holger Hennig, Huw D Summers, Fabian J Theis, Joana Cerveira, James O Patterson, Derek Davies, Andrew Filby, Anne E Carpenter, Paul Rees

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Systematic data analysis pipeline for quantitative morphological cell phenotyping.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Thomas BlasiImaging Platform at the Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, 415 Main St, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.
Holger HennigImaging Platform at the Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, 415 Main St, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.
Huw D SummersCollege of Engineering, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK.
Fabian J TheisHelmholtz Zentrum München-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Computational Biology, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2419-1943
Joana CerveiraFlow Cytometry Facility, The Francis Crick Institute, Lincoln's Inn Fields Laboratory, 44 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3LY, UK.
James O PattersonCell Cycle Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, 44 Lincoln's Inn Fields, Holborn WC2A 3LY, UK.
Derek DaviesFlow Cytometry Facility, The Francis Crick Institute, Lincoln's Inn Fields Laboratory, 44 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3LY, UK.
Andrew FilbyNewcastle Upon Tyne University, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Bioscience Centre, International Centre for life, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.
Anne E CarpenterImaging Platform at the Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, 415 Main St, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.
Paul ReesImaging Platform at the Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, 415 Main St, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N005163/1Cancer Research UKMedical Research CouncilWellcome Trust 093917
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging flow cytometry combines the high-throughput capabilities of conventional flow cytometry with single-cell imaging. Here we demonstrate label-free prediction of DNA content and quantification of the mitotic cell cycle phases by applying supervised machine learning to morphological features extracted from brightfield and the typically ignored darkfield images of cells from an imaging flow cytometer. This method facilitates non-destructive monitoring of cells avoiding potentially confounding effects of fluorescent stains while maximizing available fluorescence channels. The method is effective in cell cycle analysis for mammalian cells, both fixed and live, and accurately assesses the impact of a cell cycle mitotic phase blocking agent. As the same method is effective in predicting the DNA content of fission yeast, it is likely to have a broad application to other cell types.

Indexed as

Cell CycleDNAFlow CytometryHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedJurkat CellsMachine LearningSchizosaccharomycesDNA

Identifiers

PMID26739115
PMCPMC4729834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.