Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26738936›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2016

Targeting indoor residual spraying for malaria using epidemiological data: a case study of the Zambia experience.

Jessie Pinchoff, David A Larsen, Silvia Renn, Derek Pollard, Christen Fornadel, Mark Maire, Chadwick Sikaala, Chomba Sinyangwe, Benjamin Winters, Daniel J Bridges and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jessie PinchoffJohn Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. jpinchoff@gmail.com.
David A LarsenAkros, Cresta Golfview Grounds, Great East Road, Unit 5, Lusaka, Zambia. dlarsen@akros.com.
Silvia RennAkros, Cresta Golfview Grounds, Great East Road, Unit 5, Lusaka, Zambia. silvia.renn@gmail.com.
Derek PollardAkros, Cresta Golfview Grounds, Great East Road, Unit 5, Lusaka, Zambia. dpollard@akros.com.
Christen FornadelUS President's Malaria Initiative, Washington, DC, USA. cfornadel@usaid.gov.
Mark MaireDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. mmaire@cdc.gov.
Chadwick SikaalaNational Malaria Control Centre, Ministry of Health, Government of the Republic of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia. chsikaala@yahoo.com.
Chomba SinyangweUS President's Malaria Initiative, Washington, DC, USA. csinyangwe@usaid.gov.
Benjamin WintersAkros, Cresta Golfview Grounds, Great East Road, Unit 5, Lusaka, Zambia. bwinters@akros.com.
Daniel J BridgesAkros, Cresta Golfview Grounds, Great East Road, Unit 5, Lusaka, Zambia. dbridges@akros.com.
Anna M WintersAkros, Cresta Golfview Grounds, Great East Road, Unit 5, Lusaka, Zambia. awinters@akros.com.
University of Montana · USU.S. President's Malaria Initiative · USCenter for Global Health · USJohns Hopkins University · USMinistry of Health · ZM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Zambia and other sub-Saharan African countries affected by ongoing malaria transmission, indoor residual spraying (IRS) for malaria prevention has typically been implemented over large areas, e.g., district-wide, and targeted to peri-urban areas. However, there is a recent shift in some countries, including Zambia, towards the adoption of a more strategic and targeted IRS approach, in coordination with increased emphasis on universal coverage of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and effective insecticide resistance management. A true targeted approach would deliver IRS to sub-district areas identified as high-risk, with the goal of maximizing the prevention of malaria cases and deaths.

resultsTogether with the Government of the Republic of Zambia, a new methodology was developed applying geographic information systems and satellite imagery to support a targeted IRS campaign during the 2014 spray season using health management information system data. DISCUSSION/

conclusionThis case study focuses on the developed methodology while also highlighting the significant research gaps which must be filled to guide countries on the most effective strategy for IRS targeting in the context of universal LLIN coverage and evolving insecticide resistance.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnophelesGeographic Information SystemsHumansInsecticidesInsecticide-Treated BednetsInsect VectorsMalariaMosquito ControlZambiaInsecticides

Identifiers

PMID26738936
PMCPMC4704423
OpenAlexW2227189229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.