Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26738658›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2016

Controlled microfluidics to examine growth-factor induced migration of neural progenitors in the Drosophila visual system.

Cade Beck, Tanya Singh, Angela Farooqi, Tadmiri Venkatesh, Maribel Vazquez

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Stem cells technology: a powerful tool behind new brain treatments.Drug delivery and translational research · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cade BeckDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York-CUNY, USA.
Tanya SinghDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York-CUNY, USA.
Angela FarooqiDepartment of Biology, The City College of New York-CUNY, USA.
Tadmiri VenkateshDepartment of Biology, The City College of New York-CUNY, USA.
Maribel VazquezDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York-CUNY, USA. Electronic address: vazquez@ccny.cuny.edu.
City College of New York · US

Funding

VOLTAGE GATING OF ION CHANNELS--SIMULATIONS AND AB INITIO CALCULATIONSS06GM008168 · NIGMS · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI HUBBARD, KAREN · 1989 to 2010
$17.6M
Cellular/Molecular Basis of Development: Research CenterG12MD007603 · NIMHD · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI PEZZANO, MARK · 2012 to 2017
$11.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS S06 GM008168NIMHD NIH HHS 8G12MD007603-29NIMHD NIH HHS G12 MD007603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe developing visual system in Drosophila melanogaster provides an excellent model with which to examine the effects of changing microenvironments on neural cell migration via microfluidics, because the combined experimental system enables direct genetic manipulation, in vivo observation, and in vitro imaging of cells, post-embryo. Exogenous signaling from ligands such as fibroblast growth factor (FGF) is well-known to control glia differentiation, cell migration, and axonal wrapping central to vision. NEW

methodThe current study employs a microfluidic device to examine how controlled concentration gradient fields of FGF are able to regulate the migration of vision-critical glia cells with and without cellular contact with neuronal progenitors.

resultsOur findings quantitatively illustrate a concentration-gradient dependent chemotaxis toward FGF, and further demonstrate that glia require collective and coordinated neuronal locomotion to achieve directionality, sustain motility, and propagate long cell distances in the visual system. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): Conventional assays are unable to examine concentration- and gradient-dependent migration. Our data illustrate quantitative correlations between ligand concentration/gradient and glial cell distance traveled, independent or in contact with neurons.

conclusionsMicrofluidic systems in combination with a genetically-amenable experimental system empowers researchers to dissect the signaling pathways that underlie cellular migration during nervous system development. Our findings illustrate the need for coordinated neuron-glia migration in the Drosophila visual system, as only glia within heterogeneous populations exhibited increasing motility along distances that increased with increasing FGF concentration. Such coordinated migration and chemotactic dependence can be manipulated for potential therapeutic avenues for NS repair and/or disease treatment.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCell MovementCells, CulturedComputer SimulationDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrosophilaExtracellular Matrix ProteinsFibroblast Growth FactorsFlow CytometryGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHistonesMicrofluidicsModels, BiologicalNeural Stem CellsVisual PathwaysExtracellular Matrix ProteinsFibroblast Growth FactorsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHistonesDrosophilaFGFGliaMicrofluidicsVisual system

Identifiers

PMID26738658
PMCPMC4775339
OpenAlexW2210812380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.