Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26738483›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2016

The role of gender on malaria preventive behaviour among rural households in Kenya.

Gracious M Diiro, Hippolyte D Affognon, Beatrice W Muriithi, Sarah Kingori Wanja, Charles Mbogo, Clifford Mutero

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gracious M DiiroInternational Center of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), Nairobi, Kenya. diirog@yahoo.co.uk.
Hippolyte D AffognonInternational Center of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), Nairobi, Kenya. haffognon@icipe.org.
Beatrice W MuriithiInternational Center of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), Nairobi, Kenya. bmuriithi@icipe.org.
Sarah Kingori WanjaInternational Center of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), Nairobi, Kenya. skingori@icipe.org.
Charles MbogoKenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Kilifi, Kenya. cmbogo@icipe.org.
Clifford MuteroInternational Center of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), Nairobi, Kenya. cmutro@icipe.org.
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology · KEKenya Medical Research Institute · KEUniversity of Pretoria · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalaria remains a major health and development challenge in the sub-Saharan African economies including Kenya, yet it can be prevented. Technologies to prevent malaria are available but are not universally adopted by male- and female-headed households. The study thus, examined the role of gender in malaria prevention, examining adoption behaviour between male- and female-headed households in Kenya.

methodsThe study uses a recent baseline cross-section survey data collected from 2718 households in parts of western and eastern Kenya. Two separate models were estimated for male- and female-headed households to determine if the drivers of adoption differ between the two categories of households.

resultsThe findings from the study show that: access to public health information, residing in villages with higher experience in malaria prevention, knowledge on the cause and transmission of malaria significantly increase the number of practices adopted in both male- and female-headed households. On the other hand, formal education of the household head and livestock units owned exhibited a positive and significant effect on adoption among male-headed households, but no effect among female-headed households.

conclusionsThe findings from thus study suggest that universal policy tools can be used to promote uptake of integrated malaria prevention practices, for female- and male-headed households.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansKenyaMalariaMaleRural PopulationSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID26738483
PMCPMC4704398
OpenAlexW2230200786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.