ArticleAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference2015
Multivariate outcomes in a three week bimanual self-telerehabilitation with error augmentation post-stroke.
Article in Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effects of error-augmentation versus error-reduction paradigms in robotic therapy to enhance upper extremity performance and recovery post-stroke: a systematic review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2018Pooled it
- Key components of mechanical work predict outcomes in robotic stroke therapy.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2020Trial
- Regression techniques employing feature selection to predict clinical outcomes in stroke.PloS one · 2018Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We present the outcomes of a study on stroke patients in a 3-week intervention of bimanual self-telerehabilitation. This training is similar to an upper-extremity treadmill in that patients can make use of their healthy arm to provide a cue for the more impaired arm. We further inspected a cohort that covertly received error augmentation training while they practiced. Finally, we focused here on the many quantitative measures available from the robotic device, testing if these measures collectively can predict outcome on the final day. We found in a cross-validation study that predictions are possible, yielding median r-squared values over 99%. Several particular measures were found to dominate their contribution to the prediction of recoverability. These results show that interactive self-rehabilitation may be a viable method for motor restoration, and the quantitative metrics available can be used to predict the eventual state of recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.