Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26735891›Full record

Trial reportOncotarget2016

Safety and efficacy of sorafenib therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: final outcome from the Chinese patient subset of the GIDEON study.

Sheng-Long Ye, Xiaoping Chen, Jiamei Yang, Ping Bie, Shuijun Zhang, Fengyong Liu, Luming Liu, Jie Zhou, Kefeng Dou, Chunyi Hao and 11 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00812175 (Global Investigation of Therapeutic Decisions in Hepatocellular Carcinoma and of Its Treatment With Sorafenib), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00812175 completednot on this map

Global Investigation of Therapeutic Decisions in Hepatocellular Carcinoma and of Its Treatment With Sorafenib

TypeobservationalSponsorBayerRan2009 to 2012Enrolled3,371ConditionsCarcinoma, HepatocellularArmsSorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Tamoxifen for adults with hepatocellular carcinoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Overall Survival in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Sorafenib: A Polish Experience.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Sheng-Long YeLiver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoping ChenDepartment of Surgery, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Jiamei YangDepartment of Special Treatment, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Ping BieInstitute of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Shuijun ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Fengyong LiuDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Luming LiuShanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jie ZhouDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Kefeng DouDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Chunyi HaoDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Beijing Cancer Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Guoliang ShaoDepartment of Radiology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Qiang XiaDepartment of Liver Surgery, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yajin ChenDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jijin YangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaxing DengDepartment of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yunpeng LiuDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Yunfei YuanDepartment of Hepatobiliary, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhiren FuDepartment of Liver Transplantation, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Keiko NakajimaGlobal Medical Affairs, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Montville, NJ, USA.
Christina S M YipMedical Affairs Oncology, Bayer Healthcare Company Ltd., Beijing, China.
Zhengguang LuMedical Affairs Oncology, Bayer Healthcare Company Ltd., Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report data from the final analysis of the Chinese subset of the GIDEON (the Global Investigation of therapeutic DEcisions in hepatocellular carcinoma and Of its treatment with sorafeNib) study, which evaluated the safety and efficacy of sorafenib in Child-Pugh A, B and C patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) in real-life clinical practice. Patient demographics, disease characteristics and treatment history were recorded at enrollment; dose, adverse events (AEs) and efficacy were recorded at follow-up. Of the 338 evaluable patients, 98.5% started on 800 mg/day sorafenib, regardless of their Child-Pugh status. The median treatment duration (21.1 vs. 18.8 weeks) and median overall survival (322 vs 240 days) were longer in patients with Child-Pugh A compared with the Child-Pugh B, progression-free survival were 183 vs. 208 days, respectively). AEs (all grades) were comparable in the Child-Pugh B vs A group (56.3% vs. 50.4%, respectively), moreover, the Child-Pugh B group also had comparable rates of drug-related AEs (35.4% vs. 27.2%, respectively) and serious AEs (25.0% vs. 23.0%, respectively) compared with the Child-Pugh A group. The overall dosing strategy was consistent in Chinese patients across Child-Pugh subgroups. Tolerability and safety data suggest that Child-Pugh B patients might be safely treated with sorafenib. The findings from our study showed that safety profile of sorafenib in terms of rate and type of AEs is similar to the global international GIDEON study as well as other pivotal studies.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsAsian PeopleCarcinoma, HepatocellularDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsSorafenibTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsSorafenibChild-PughChinese subsetGIDEONsorafenibunresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID26735891
PMCPMC4872739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.