Trial reportOncotarget2016
Safety and efficacy of sorafenib therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: final outcome from the Chinese patient subset of the GIDEON study.
Trial report in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00812175 (Global Investigation of Therapeutic Decisions in Hepatocellular Carcinoma and of Its Treatment With Sorafenib), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Global Investigation of Therapeutic Decisions in Hepatocellular Carcinoma and of Its Treatment With Sorafenib
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Tamoxifen for adults with hepatocellular carcinoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Gene therapy for people with hepatocellular carcinoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Targeted Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment: A New Era Ahead-A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Pooled it
- First- and Second-Line Treatments for Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in China: A Systematic Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients with Child-Pugh A and B cirrhosis: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Systemic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Chinese Consensus-Based Interdisciplinary Expert Statements.Liver cancer · 2022Review
- Advances in Pharmacotherapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A State-of-the-Art Review.Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Overall Survival in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Sorafenib: A Polish Experience.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021Article
- Peripheral blood neutrophil count as a prognostic factor for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2017Article
- Sorafenib: A Review in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Targeted oncology · 2017Review
- Article
- Erythropoietin promoted the proliferation of hepatocellular carcinoma through hypoxia induced translocation of its specific receptor.Cancer cell international · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report data from the final analysis of the Chinese subset of the GIDEON (the Global Investigation of therapeutic DEcisions in hepatocellular carcinoma and Of its treatment with sorafeNib) study, which evaluated the safety and efficacy of sorafenib in Child-Pugh A, B and C patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) in real-life clinical practice. Patient demographics, disease characteristics and treatment history were recorded at enrollment; dose, adverse events (AEs) and efficacy were recorded at follow-up. Of the 338 evaluable patients, 98.5% started on 800 mg/day sorafenib, regardless of their Child-Pugh status. The median treatment duration (21.1 vs. 18.8 weeks) and median overall survival (322 vs 240 days) were longer in patients with Child-Pugh A compared with the Child-Pugh B, progression-free survival were 183 vs. 208 days, respectively). AEs (all grades) were comparable in the Child-Pugh B vs A group (56.3% vs. 50.4%, respectively), moreover, the Child-Pugh B group also had comparable rates of drug-related AEs (35.4% vs. 27.2%, respectively) and serious AEs (25.0% vs. 23.0%, respectively) compared with the Child-Pugh A group. The overall dosing strategy was consistent in Chinese patients across Child-Pugh subgroups. Tolerability and safety data suggest that Child-Pugh B patients might be safely treated with sorafenib. The findings from our study showed that safety profile of sorafenib in terms of rate and type of AEs is similar to the global international GIDEON study as well as other pivotal studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.