Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26735845›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2016

Micronutrient-Fortified Rice Can Increase Hookworm Infection Risk: A Cluster Randomized Trial.

Brechje de Gier, Maiza Campos Ponce, Marlene Perignon, Marion Fiorentino, Kuong Khov, Chhoun Chamnan, Michiel R de Boer, Megan E Parker, Kurt Burja, Marjoleine A Dijkhuizen and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01706419 (Fortified Rice for School Children in Cambodia), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01706419 nacompletednot on this map

Fortified Rice for School Children in Cambodia: Effects on Micronutrient Status, Growth, Cognition and Health.

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut de Recherche pour le DeveloppementRan2012 to 2014Enrolled9,500ConditionsMicronutrient StatusArmsFortified rice cold extruded kernel, fortified rice warm extruded kernel, fortiified rice hot extruded kernel
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Brechje de GierSection Health and Life Sciences, Athena Institute, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maiza Campos PonceSection Infectious Diseases, department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marlene PerignonUMR-204, NutriPass IRD-UM-SupAgro, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Montpellier, France.
Marion FiorentinoUMR-204, NutriPass IRD-UM-SupAgro, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Montpellier, France.
Kuong KhovDepartment of Fisheries Post-Harvest Technologies and Quality control, Fisheries Administration, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Chhoun ChamnanDepartment of Fisheries Post-Harvest Technologies and Quality control, Fisheries Administration, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Michiel R de BoerSection Methodology and Applied Biostatistics, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Megan E ParkerPATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Kurt BurjaUnited Nations World Food Programme, Phnom Penh, Kingdom of Cambodia.
Marjoleine A DijkhuizenDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jacques BergerUMR-204, NutriPass IRD-UM-SupAgro, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Montpellier, France.
Katja PolmanSection Infectious Diseases, department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Frank T WieringaUMR-204, NutriPass IRD-UM-SupAgro, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Montpellier, France.
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement · FRAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLFisheries Administration · KHInstituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BEProgram for Appropriate Technology in Health · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFortification of staple foods is considered an effective and safe strategy to combat micronutrient deficiencies, thereby improving health. While improving micronutrient status might be expected to have positive effects on immunity, some studies have reported increases in infections or inflammation after iron supplementation.

objectiveTo study effects of micronutrient-fortified rice on hookworm infection in Cambodian schoolchildren.

methodsA double-blinded, cluster-randomized trial was conducted in 16 Cambodian primary schools partaking in the World Food Program school meal program. Three types of multi-micronutrient fortified rice were tested against placebo rice within the school meal program: UltraRice_original, UltraRice_improved and NutriRice. Four schools were randomly assigned to each study group (placebo n = 492, UltraRice_original n = 479, UltraRice_improved n = 500, NutriRice n = 506). Intestinal parasite infection was measured in fecal samples by Kato-Katz method at baseline and after three and seven months. In a subgroup (N = 330), fecal calprotectin was measured by ELISA as a marker for intestinal inflammation.

resultsBaseline prevalence of hookworm infection was 18.6%, but differed considerably among schools (range 0%- 48.1%).Micronutrient-fortified rice significantly increased risk of new hookworm infection. This effect was modified by baseline hookworm prevalence at the school; hookworm infection risk was increased by all three types of fortified rice in schools where baseline prevalence was high (>15%), and only by UltraRice_original in schools with low baseline prevalence. Neither hookworm infection nor fortified rice was related to fecal calprotectin.

conclusionsConsumption of rice fortified with micronutrients can increase hookworm prevalence, especially in environments with high infection pressure. When considering fortification of staple foods, a careful risk-benefit analysis is warranted, taking into account severity of micronutrient deficiencies and local prevalence of parasitic infections.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01706419.

Indexed as

Food, FortifiedAncylostomatoideaAnimalsChildDouble-Blind MethodEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFecesFemaleHumansIntestinal Diseases, ParasiticIron, DietaryLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexLongitudinal StudiesMaleMicronutrientsOryzaIron, DietaryLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexMicronutrients

Identifiers

PMID26735845
PMCPMC4703301
OpenAlexW2229579920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.