ArticlePloS one2016
Molecular Epidemiology of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Australian Veterinarians.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Methicillin-ResistantToxins · 2020Pooled it
- Prevalence and risk factors associated with nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant staphylococci in horses and their caregivers.Veterinary research · 2024Article
- Methicillin-resistantJournal of medical microbiology · 2024Article
- Antimicrobial resistance and clonality ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Prevalence and Characteristics ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Development and Research Progress of Anti-Drug Resistant Bacteria Drugs.Infection and drug resistance · 2021Review
- Genome Mining and Comparative Pathogenomic Analysis of An Endemic Methicillin-ResistantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- [Zoonoses and occupational health in the veterinary profession].Revista espanola de salud publica · 2018Review
- Complete Genome Sequence of a Staphylococcus aureus Sequence Type 612 Isolate from an Australian Horse.Microbiology resource announcements · 2018Article
- Bioluminescent murine models of bacterial sepsis and scald wound infections for antimicrobial efficacy testing.PloS one · 2018Article
- Transmission of highly virulent community-associated MRSA ST93 and livestock-associated MRSA ST398 between humans and pigs in Australia.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Nationwide molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus responsible for horse infections in France.BMC microbiology · 2017Article
- Evaluation of robenidine analog NCL195 as a novel broad-spectrum antibacterial agent.PloS one · 2017Article
- Antimicrobial resistance in coagulase-positive staphylococci isolated from companion animals in Australia: A one year study.PloS one · 2017Article
- Zoonotic disease risk perceptions in the British veterinary profession.Preventive veterinary medicine · 2017Article
- One Health research and training in Australia and New Zealand.Infection ecology & epidemiology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This work investigated the molecular epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolated from veterinarians in Australia in 2009. The collection (n = 44) was subjected to extensive molecular typing (MLST, spa, SCCmec, dru, PFGE, virulence and antimicrobial resistance genotyping) and antimicrobial resistance phenotyping by disk diffusion. MRSA was isolated from Australian veterinarians representing various occupational emphases. The isolate collection was dominated by MRSA strains belonging to clonal complex (CC) 8 and multilocus sequence type (ST) 22. CC8 MRSA (ST8-IV [2B], spa t064; and ST612-IV [2B], spa variable,) were strongly associated with equine practice veterinarians (OR = 17.5, 95% CI = 3.3-92.5, P < 0.001) and were often resistant to gentamicin and rifampicin. ST22-IV [2B], spa variable, were strongly associated with companion animal practice veterinarians (OR = 52.5, 95% CI = 5.2-532.7, P < 0.001) and were resistant to ciprofloxacin. A single pig practice veterinarian carried ST398-V [5C2], spa t1451. Equine practice and companion animal practice veterinarians frequently carried multiresistant-CC8 and ST22 MRSA, respectively, whereas only a single swine specialist carried MRSA ST398. The presence of these strains in veterinarians may be associated with specific antimicrobial administration practices in each animal species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.