ArticlePloS one2016
Spatial Biodiversity Patterns of Madagascar's Amphibians and Reptiles.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Not Just a Matter of Space: Integrating Ecological Niche Modeling With Genotype-Environment Associations Suggests High Maladaptation Risks Under Climate Change for a Microendemic Malagasy Frog.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Species-Specific Responses to Paleoclimatic Changes and Landscape Barriers Drive Contrasting Phylogeography of Co-Distributed Lemur Species in Northeastern Madagascar.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Cryptic species conservation: a review.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025Review
- A new microendemic gecko from the small forest fragments of south-eastern Madagascar (Squamata, Gekkonidae,ZooKeys · 2025Article
- Ecological and anthropogenic effects on the genomic diversity of lemurs in Madagascar.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025Article
- First Cytogenetic Analysis ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A conservation planning strategy applied to the evolutionary history of the mantellid frogs of Madagascar.npj biodiversity · 2023Article
- Repeated divergence of amphibians and reptiles across an elevational gradient in northern Madagascar.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Molecular exploration of fossil eggshell uncovers hidden lineage of giant extinct bird.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Article
- Half-millennium evidence suggests that extinction debts of global vertebrates started in the Second Industrial Revolution.Communications biology · 2022Article
- The establishment of ecological conservation for herpetofauna species in hotspot areas of South Korea.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Win-win opportunities combining high yields with high multi-taxa biodiversity in tropical agroforestry.Nature communications · 2022Article
- An unexpected new red-belliedZooKeys · 2022Article
- Environmental drivers of Cheirogaleidae population density: Remarkable resilience of Madagascar's smallest lemurs to habitat degradation.Ecology and evolution · 2021Review
- How citizen science could improve species distribution models and their independent assessment.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Article
- Review
- Estimating Herd Immunity to Amphibian Chytridiomycosis in Madagascar Based on the Defensive Function of Amphibian Skin Bacteria.Frontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Madagascar has become a model region for testing hypotheses of species diversification and biogeography, and many studies have focused on its diverse and highly endemic herpetofauna. Here we combine species distribution models of a near-complete set of species of reptiles and amphibians known from the island with body size data and a tabulation of herpetofaunal communities from field surveys, compiled up to 2008. Though taxonomic revisions and novel distributional records arose since compilation, we are confident that the data are appropriate for inferring and comparing biogeographic patterns among these groups of organisms. We observed species richness of both amphibians and reptiles was highest in the humid rainforest biome of eastern Madagascar, but reptiles also show areas of high richness in the dry and subarid western biomes. In several amphibian subclades, especially within the Mantellidae, species richness peaks in the central eastern geographic regions while in reptiles different subclades differ distinctly in their richness centers. A high proportion of clades and subclades of both amphibians and reptiles have a peak of local endemism in the topographically and bioclimatically diverse northern geographic regions. This northern area is roughly delimited by a diagonal spanning from 15.5°S on the east coast to ca. 15.0°S on the west coast. Amphibian diversity is highest at altitudes between 800-1200 m above sea-level whereas reptiles have their highest richness at low elevations, probably reflecting the comparatively large number of species specialized to the extended low-elevation areas in the dry and subarid biomes. We found that the range sizes of both amphibians and reptiles strongly correlated with body size, and differences between the two groups are explained by the larger body sizes of reptiles. However, snakes have larger range sizes than lizards which cannot be readily explained by their larger body sizes alone. Range filling, i.e., the amount of suitable habitat occupied by a species, is less expressed in amphibians than in reptiles, possibly reflecting their lower dispersal capacity. Taxonomic composition of communities assessed by field surveys is largely explained by bioclimatic regions, with communities from the dry and especially subarid biomes distinctly differing from humid and subhumid biomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.